Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
The shoot system of _Sigillaria_ consisted of a stout stem tapering
upwards to a height of 100 feet[457] or more as an unbranched column,
with its dome-shaped apex[458] covered with linear grass-like
leaves or, in some species, such as _Sigillaria Brardi_[459], _S.
Eugenii_[460], etc., the main trunk was occasionally divided by
apparently equal dichotomy. The younger portions of the stem or
branches were in some species clothed with leaves separated by a narrow
zigzag groove surrounding their hexagonal bases, while in other
forms each leaf was seated on a more or less prominent cushion having
the form illustrated by _Sigillaria McMurtriei_ (fig. 194) or by the
example represented in fig. 200, H; or as in the ribbed species shown
in figs. 193, B, and 195, the leaves in vertical series were separated
from one another by longer portions of the ribs. As in _Lepidodendron_
the cushions are frequently characterised by irregular transverse
wrinklings and other[461] surface-ornamentation which in some instances
at least may have been produced as the result of _post-mortem_
shrinkage of superficial tissue. From the rarity of shoots with the
foliage attached, it would seem that the leaves persisted for a
comparatively short time and were cut off by an absciss-layer leaving
behind a well-marked leaf-scar area. The linear leaves, reaching in
rare cases a length of one metre (e.g. _S. lepidodendrifolia_) but
usually much shorter, possessed a single median bundle, and the lower
face was characterised by two stomatal grooves and a median keel. It is
not uncommon to find leaf-bases of _Sigillaria_ detached from the stem
and preserved as separate impressions. The term _Sigillariophyllum_
used by Grand’Eury[462] may be applied to detached leaves, though it
is by no means easy to distinguish between the foliage of _Sigillaria_
and _Lepidodendron_. A comparison of a typical species of _Sigillaria_,
such as _S. rugosa_ (fig. 193, B) or _S. Brardi_ (fig. 196, A–C) with
a typical _Lepidodendron_ reveals obvious differences in the form of
the leaf-cushion, but in some cases the distinction becomes purely
arbitrary.
[Illustration: FIG. 194. _Sigillaria McMurtriei_ Kidst. From a
specimen from the Upper Coal-Measures of Radstock, in the British
Museum (V. 952). Nat. size.]
[Illustration: FIG. 195. _Sigillaria mammillaris._ (Rhytidolepis
form.) From a specimen in the Manchester Museum. _p_, parichnos;
_l_, ligule-pit; _t_, leaf-trace; _c_, cushion; _s_, leaf-scar.]
[Illustration: FIG. 196.
A–C. _Sigillaria Brardi._ (A after Germar; B, C after Zeiller.)
D. _Sigillaria laevigata._
E. _Lepidodendron Wortheni_ (D and E after Zeiller).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account