No specimens have been described which enable us to correlate with certainty mature leaves or foliage-shoots with the petrified bud. It is, however, not improbable that the impression from Mount Pelé near Epinac named by Renault _Dolerophyllum Berthieri_[384] may be correctly referred to the same genus. The type-specimen consists of an axis, whether a rachis of a compound leaf or a shoot with simple leaves cannot be determined, bearing partially overlapping more or less orbicular leaves 18–20 cm. in diameter, with a _Cyclopteris_ venation. Among other leaves of unknown affinity referred to the same genus attention is drawn to _Dolerophyllum pseudopeltatum_ (Grand’Eury)[385] with an orbicular lamina reaching in some specimens 22 × 19 cm. Specimens of _Dolerophyllum pseudopeltatum_ are figured by Renault from the Commentry coal-field[386], some of which reach a diameter of 12 cm. The only British specimen of a leaflet of this type which I have seen is one in Dr Kidston’s collection from the Stephanian series, Glamorganshire. It is probable that some at least of the impressions assigned to _Dolerophyllum_ or _Doleropteris_ would be more appropriately included in _Cyclopteris_ or _Cardiopteris_ and may have been borne on the axis of large Pteridosperm fronds. Grand’Eury[387] has also called attention to the difficulty of distinguishing the larger _Cyclopteris_ leaflets from _Dolerophyllum_. Some of the Cyclopteroid leaflets figured by Roehl[388] on _Neuropteris_ fronds differ but slightly from those of _D. pseudopeltatum_. The shoot showing large leaf-scars figured by Saporta and Marion[389] as probably the axis of a _Dolerophyllum_ may well be a piece of _Cordaites_. [Illustration: Fig. 432. A. _Dolerophyllum Goepperti_, section of vein. B. _Dolerophyllum Berthieri_; _s_, microspores. C. _Dolerophyllum fertile_. D. _Dolerophyllum fertile_, microspores. (After Renault.)] _Microsporophylls assigned to_ Dolerophyllum.