Frances Mary Buss and her work for educationRidley, Annie E.
History
Frances Mary Buss and her work for education
Ridley, Annie E.
Buss, Frances Mary, 1827-1894
In such cases, the “managing committee” is clearly not what is wanted.
Here are weighty words from a head-mistress, who must take highest rank
among the “experts”—
“No one knows how much of one’s health and energy is lost to the
school by the anxieties of getting those who do not understand
the complicated machinery not to interfere with things with
which the head alone ought to deal.
“Governors have no idea of the worries head-mistresses have,
when hysterical girls invent absurd stories; when parents and
doctors attribute every illness, real or imaginary, to lessons;
when teachers get wrong, or when they suddenly disappear, take
head-mistress-ships elsewhere, and draw away their friends and
pupils.
“Then, again, the governing body will blame for the inevitable,
or a head will deal with ninety-nine intricate cases, and in the
hundredth will make a mistake; they naturally know nothing of
the former, but of the latter they hear, only to condemn.”
This is one very important side. The head clearly has very definite
rights. But, there is also the other side, and the members of the
council have also their rights. Even the “mere amateur” is not without
rights, as a person who, in combining special interest in education,
with wider and more varied experience than can be enjoyed by the
professional educator, is therefore of use on the council in his power
of seeing things from the outside, and thus bringing to bear on them a
judgment not warped by mere professional bias. Even on the most
haphazard council, the persons elected are at least supposed to have
some power of help. These “amateurs” are consequently persons who are
more used to lead than to follow, to take the active rather than the
passive attitude, and to whom mere acquiescence is as uncongenial as it
is unaccustomed. It is therefore easy to imagine such a council growing
restive, even under the most competent leading, and asking, “Is it
really our whole duty to sit here simply to register the decrees of the
head-mistress?”
To strike the happy mean between tyranny and subjection is the duty
alike of the governing body and of head-master or mistress. The
governing body must not rule; nor, on the other hand, must its members
be too passive, or acquiesce when they ought to oppose. If they are
bound to follow competent leading, they are no less bound to dismiss the
incompetent. The captain of a ship gives place to a duly accredited
pilot, but he is none the less bound to judge whether the ship is making
for the straight course or not. To give up his command into unskilful
hands is, on the one side, as foolish as it would be to tie the pilot to
the mast, and let the ship go down, whilst the crew dispute for the
right to steer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account