Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
The immense defect that want of sympathy is, may be strikingly seen in
the failure of the many attempts that have been made in all ages to
construct the Christian character, omitting sympathy. It has produced
numbers of people walking up and down one narrow plank of self-restraint,
pondering over their own merits and demerits, keeping out, not the world
exactly, but their fellow-creatures from their hearts, and caring only to
drive their neighbours before them on this plank of theirs, or to push
them headlong. Thus, with many virtues, and much hard work at the
formation of character, we have had splendid bigots or censorious small
people.
But sympathy is warmth and light too. It is, as it were, the moral
atmosphere connecting all animated natures. Putting aside, for a moment,
the large differences that opinions, language, and education make between
men, look at the innate diversity of character. Natural philosophers
were amazed when they thought they had found a new-created species. But
what is each man but a creature such as the world has not before seen?
Then think how they pour forth in multitudinous masses, from princes
delicately nurtured to little boys on scrubby commons, or in dark
cellars. How are these people to be understood, to be taught to
understand each other, but by those who have the deepest sympathies with
all? There cannot be a great man without large sympathy. There may be
men who play loud-sounding parts in life without it, as on the stage,
where kings and great people sometimes enter who are only characters of
secondary import—deputy great men. But the interest and the instruction
lie with those who have to feel and suffer most.
* * * * *
Add courage to this openness we have been considering, and you have a man
who can own himself in the wrong, can forgive, can trust, can adventure,
can, in short, use all the means that insight and sympathy endow him
with.
* * * * *
I see no other essential characteristics in the greatness of nations than
there are in the greatness of individuals. Extraneous circumstances
largely influence nations as individuals; and make a larger part of the
show of the former than of the latter; as we are wont to consider no
nation great that is not great in extent or resources, as well as in
character. But of two nations, equal in other respects, the superiority
must belong to the one which excels in courage and openness of mind and
soul.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account