Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
Again, in estimating the relative merits of different periods of the
world, we must employ the same tests of greatness that we use to
individuals. To compare, for instance, the present and the past. What
astounds us most in the past is the wonderful intolerance and cruelty: a
cruelty constantly turning upon the inventors: an intolerance provoking
ruin to the thing it would foster. The most admirable precepts are
thrown from time to time upon this cauldron of human affairs, and
oftentimes they only seem to make it blaze the higher. We find men
devoting the best part of their intellects to the invariable annoyance
and persecution of their fellows. You might think that the earth brought
forth with more abundant fruitfulness in the past than now, seeing that
men found so much time for cruelty, but that you read of famines and
privations which these latter days cannot equal. The recorded violent
deaths amount to millions. And this is but a small part of the matter.
Consider the modes of justice; the use of torture, for instance. What
must have been the blinded state of the wise persons (wise for their day)
who used torture? Did they ever think themselves, “What should we not
say if we were subjected to this?” Many times they must really have
desired to get at the truth; and such was their mode of doing it. Now,
at the risk of being thought “a laudator” of time present, I would say,
here is the element of greatness we have made progress in. We are more
open in mind and soul. We have arrived (some of us at least) at the
conclusion that men may honestly differ without offence. We have learned
to pity each other more. There is a greatness in modern toleration which
our ancestors knew not.
Then comes the other element of greatness, courage. Have we made
progress in that? This is a much more dubious question. The subjects of
terror vary so much in different times that it is difficult to estimate
the different degrees of courage shown in resisting them. Men fear
public opinion now as they did in former times the Star Chamber; and
those awful goddesses, Appearances, are to us what the Fates were to the
Greeks. It is hardly possible to measure the courage of a modern against
that of an ancient; but I am unwilling to believe but that enlightenment
must strengthen courage.
The application of the tests of greatness, as in the above instance, is a
matter of detail and of nice appreciation, as to the results of which men
must be expected to differ largely: the tests themselves remain
invariable—openness of nature to admit the light of love and reason, and
courage to pursue it.
* * * * *
_Ellesmere_. I agree to your theory, as far as openness of nature is
concerned; but I do not much like to put that half-brute thing, courage,
so high.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account