Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
_Ellesmere_. Do not tell, either of you, what I have been saying. I
shall always be poked up into some garret when I come to see you, if you
do.
_Dunsford_. I think the most curious thing, as regards people living
together, is the intense ignorance they sometimes are in of each other.
Many years ago, one or other of you said something of this kind to me,
and I have often thought of it since.
_Milverton_. People fulfil a relation towards each other, and they only
know each other in that relation, especially if it is badly managed by
the superior one; but any way the relationship involves some ignorance.
They perform orbits round each other, each gyrating, too, upon his own
axis, and there are parts of the character of each which are never
brought into view of the other.
_Ellesmere_. I should carry this notion of yours, Milverton, farther
than you do. There is a peculiar mental relation soon constituted
between associates of any kind, which confines and prevents complete
knowledge on both sides. Each man, in some measure therefore, knows
others only through himself. Tennyson makes Ulysses say,
“I am a part of all that I have seen;”
it might have run,
“I am a part of all that I have heard.”
_Dunsford_. Ellesmere becoming metaphysical and transcendental!
_Ellesmere_. Well, well, we will leave these heights, and descend in
little drops of criticism. There are two or three things you might have
pointed out, Milverton. Perhaps you would say that they are included in
what you have said, but I think not. You talk of the mischief of much
comment on each other amongst those who live together. You might have
shown, I think, that in the case of near friends and relations this
comment also deepens into interference—at least it partakes of that
nature. Friends and relations should, therefore, be especially careful
to avoid needless comments on each other. They do just the contrary.
That is one of the reasons why they often hate one another so much.
_Dunsford_. Ellesmere!
_Ellesmere_. Protest, if you like, my dear Dunsford.
Dissentient,
1. Because I wish it were not so.
2. Because I am sorry that it is.
(Signed) DUNSFORD.
_Milverton_. “Hate” is too strong a word, Ellesmere; what you say would
be true enough, if you would put “are not in sympathy with.”
_Ellesmere_. “Have a quiet distaste for.” That is the proper medium.
Now, to go to another matter. You have not put the case of over-managing
people, who are tremendous to live with.
_Milverton_. I have spoken about “interfering unreasonably with others.”
_Ellesmere_. That does not quite convey what I mean. It is when the
manager and the managee are both of the same mind as to the thing to be
done; but the former insists, and instructs, and suggests, and foresees,
till the other feels that all free agency for him is gone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account