From Ritual to RomanceWeston, Jessie L. (Jessie Laidlay)
Religion
From Ritual to Romance
Weston, Jessie L. (Jessie Laidlay)
Grail -- Legends -- History and criticism; Romances -- History and criticism
In the _Perceval_ of Chrétien de Troyes we find ourselves in presence
of certain definite changes, neither slight, nor unimportant, upon
which it seems to me insufficient stress has hitherto been laid. The
question is changed; the hero no longer asks what the Grail is, but (as
in the prose _Perceval_) whom it serves? a departure from an essential
and primitive simplicity—the motive for which is apparent in Chrétien,
but not in the prose form, where there is no enigmatic personality to
be served apart. A far more important change is that, while the malady
of the Fisher King is antecedent to the hero’s visit, and capable of
cure if the question be asked, the failure to fulfil the prescribed
conditions of itself entails disaster upon the land. Thus the sickness
of the King, and the desolation of the land, are not necessarily
connected as cause and effect, but, a point which seems hitherto
unaccountably to have been overlooked, the latter is directly
attributable to the Quester himself.[7]
“Car se tu demandé l’eusses
Li rice roi qui moult s’esmaie
Fust or tost garis de sa plaie
Et si tenist sa tière en pais
Dont il n’en tenra point jamais,”
but by Perceval’s failure to ask the question he has entailed dire
misfortune upon the land:
“Dames en perdront lor maris,
Tiéres en seront essiliés,
Et pucielles desconselliés
Orfenes, veves, en remanront
Et maint chevalier en morront.”[8]
This idea, that the misfortunes of the land are not antecedent to, but
dependent upon, the hero’s abortive visit to the Grail Castle, is
carried still further by the compiler of the _Perlesvaus_, where the
failure of the predestined hero to ask concerning the office of the
Grail is alone responsible for the illness of the King and the
misfortunes of the country. “Une grans dolors est avenue an terre
novelement par un jeune chevalier qui fu herbergiez an l’ostel au riche
roi Peschéor, si aparut à lui li saintimes Graaus, et la lance de quoi
li fiers seigne par la poignte; ne demanda de quoi ce servoit, ou dont
ce venoit, et por ce qu’il ne demanda sont toutes les terres comméues
an guerre, ne chevalier n’ancontre autre au forest qu’il ne li core
sus, et ocie s’il peut.”[9]
“Li Roi Pecheors de qui est grant dolors, quar il est cheüz en une
douleureuse langour—ceste langour li est venue par celui qui se heberga
an son ostel, à qui li seintimes Graaus s’aparut, por ce que cil ne
vost demander de qu’il an servoit, toutes les terres an furent comméues
en gerre.”[10]
“Je suis cheüz an langour dès cele oure que li chevaliers se herberga
çoianz dont vous avez oï parler; par un soule parole que il déloia a
dire me vint ceste langour.”[11]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account