From Ritual to RomanceWeston, Jessie L. (Jessie Laidlay)
Religion
From Ritual to Romance
Weston, Jessie L. (Jessie Laidlay)
Grail -- Legends -- History and criticism; Romances -- History and criticism
I have already referred to the fact, first pointed out by the late Mr
Alfred Nutt,[16] that the four treasures of the Tuatha de Danann
correspond generally with the group of symbols found in the Grail
romances; this correspondence becomes the more interesting in view of
the fact that these mysterious Beings are now recognized as alike
Demons of Fertility and Lords of Life. As Mr Nutt subsequently pointed
out, the ‘Treasures’ may well be, Sword and Cauldron certainly are,
‘Life’ symbols.
Of direct connection between these Celtic objects and the Grail story
there is no trace; as remarked above, we have no Irish Folk or Hero
tale at all corresponding to the Legend; the relation must, therefore,
go back beyond the date of formation of these tales, _i.e._, it must be
considered as one of origin rather than of dependence.
But we have further evidence that these four objects do, in fact, form
a special group entirely independent of any appearance in Folk-lore or
Romance. They exist to-day as the four suits of the Tarot.
Students of the Grail texts, whose attention is mainly occupied with
Medieval Literature, may not be familiar with the word Tarot, or aware
of its meaning. It is the name given to a pack of cards, seventy-eight
in number, of which twenty-two are designated as the ‘Keys.’
These cards are divided into four suits, which correspond with those of
the ordinary cards; they are:
Cup (Chalice, or Goblet)—Hearts.
Lance (Wand, or Sceptre)—Diamonds.
Sword—Spades.
Dish (Circles, or Pentangles, the form varies)—Clubs.
To-day the Tarot has fallen somewhat into disrepute, being principally
used for purposes of divination, but its origin, and precise relation
to our present playing-cards, are questions of considerable antiquarian
interest. Were these cards the direct parents of our modern pack, or
are they entirely distinct therefrom?[17]
Some writers are disposed to assign a very high antiquity to the Tarot.
Traditionally, it is said to have been brought from Egypt; there is no
doubt that parallel designs and combinations are to be found in the
surviving decorations of Egyptian temples, notably in the astronomic
designs on the ceiling of one of the halls of the palace of Medinet
Abou, which is supported on twenty-two columns (a number corresponding
to the ‘keys’ of the Tarot), and also repeated in a calendar sculptured
on the southern façade of the same building, under a sovereign of the
XXIII dynasty. This calendar is supposed to have been connected with
the periodic rise and fall of the waters of the Nile.[18]
The Tarot has also been connected with an ancient Chinese monument,
traditionally erected in commemoration of the drying up of the waters
of the Deluge by Yao. The face of this monument is divided up into
small sections corresponding in size and number with the cards of the
Tarot, and bearing characters which have, so far, not been deciphered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account