Fundamental Peace Ideas including The Westphalian Peace Treaty (1648) and The League Of Nations (1919): in connection with International Psychology and RevolutionsMacDonald, Arthur
History
Fundamental Peace Ideas including The Westphalian Peace Treaty (1648) and The League Of Nations (1919): in connection with International Psychology and Revolutions
MacDonald, Arthur
Peace; Peace of Westphalia (1648)
Another cause of the war was the inherent incompatibility of religious
views among the people. Religious discord exists to-day, but it is not
decided by bloody contests, because of breadth of religious insight,
general indifference, and increasing skepticism. The convictions of the
people of the seventeenth century, as to the truth of their own opinions
and the errors of their opponents, were of such an absolute character as
can not be found nowadays even among people with the most rigid beliefs.
They did not know then that it was possible to live together and yet
have the most varied and contradictory religious convictions. To suppose
that these people were stupid is an error. The chances are that they
were less stupid than the people are to-day. How many, at the present
time, can look at their country, its ideals, ideas, and customs justly
and without prejudice? Naturally very few. But to place ourselves
outside of not only our country but our generation is much more
difficult. How could we then expect the people of the seventeenth
century to do this?
IGNORANCE THE FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF THE WAR.
The fundamental cause that brought the Thirty Years' War to a close was
mental insight into the uselessness and hopelessness of further
struggle, caused by the feeling of exhaustion due to the long
continuance of the war. The reason why this war put an end to all
religious wars was, that this intellectual insight became general in
Europe, inculcating more liberal religious views. This psychological
attitude, with increasing indifference to religion and resultant
skepticism, caused religious questions to be regarded less seriously,
making further wars for such purposes impossible. The basal reason,
therefore, was the intellectual realization of the foolishness of
bloodshed on account of difference of religious convictions; that is,
lack of knowledge of this fact in the past--in short, ignorance--was at
the bottom of it all, as of most evils in the world.
COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE THIRTY YEARS' WAR AND THE EUROPEAN WAR.
In order to learn what suggestions from the Thirty Years' War may be of
use for the League of Nations in the future it will be well to mention
the general similarities and differences between this war and the recent
European war.
The similarities are as follows:
1. The Thirty Years' War began with the throwing out of a window
(defenestration) of detested persons; the European war started from an
assassination.
2. The Thirty Years' War had been expected for some time; a general
European war had been predicted for many years.
3. The Thirty Years' War, beginning with a local incident, spread from
country to country, just like the European war did.
4. The Thirty Years' War was exceedingly brutal for its generation, just
as the European war has been for our time.
5. The Thirty Years' War was a very long one for its generation; the
European war has been a relatively long one for recent times.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account