Artists -- England -- Biography; Watts, George Frederick, 1817-1904
a large and swinging limb, a breast bound as with bands of brass. Of
course the deficiency in such a case is very far from being altogether
on one side. There are abysses in Burne-Jones which Watts could not
understand, the Celtic madness, older than any sanity, the hunger that
will remain after the longest feast, the sorrow that is built up of
stratified delights. From the point of view of the true Celt, Watts, the
Watts who painted the great stoical pictures _Love and Death_, _Time,
Death and Judgment_, _The Court of Death_, _Mammon_, and _Cain_, this
pictorial Watts would probably be, must almost certainly be, simply a
sad, sane, strong, stupid Englishman. He may or may not be Welsh by
extraction or by part of his extraction, but in spirit he is an
Englishman, with all the faults and all the disadvantages of an
Englishman. He is a great Englishman like Milton or Gladstone, of the
type, that is to say, that were too much alive for anything but gravity,
and who enjoyed themselves far too much to trouble to enjoy a joke.
Matthew Arnold has come near to defining that kind of idealism, so
utterly different from the Celtic kind, which is to be found in Milton
and again in Watts. He has called it, in one of his finest and most
accurate phrases, “the imaginative reason.”
This racial legend about the Watts family does not seem to rest upon any
certain foundations, and as I have said, the deduction drawn from it is
quite loose and misleading. The whole is only another example of that
unfortunate, if not infamous, modern habit of talking about such things
as heredity with a vague notion that science has closed the question
when she has only just opened it. Nobody knows, as a matter of fact,
whether a Celtic mysticism can be inherited any more than a theory on
the Education Bill. But the eagerness of the popular mind to snatch at
a certainty is too impatient for the tardy processes of real hypothesis
and research. Long before heredity has become a science, it has become a
superstition. And this curious though incidental case of the origin of
the Watts genius is just one of those cases which make us wonder what
has been the real result of the great rise of science. So far the result
would painfully appear to be that whereas men in the earlier times said
unscientific things with the vagueness of gossip and legend, they now
say unscientific things with the plainness and the certainty of science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account