Artists -- England -- Biography; Watts, George Frederick, 1817-1904
Whenever, on the other hand, a man rebels faintly or
vaguely against this way of speaking, whenever a man says that he cannot
explain what he means, and that he hates argument, that his enemy is
misrepresenting him, but he cannot explain how; that man is a true sage,
and has seen into the heart of the real nature of language. Whenever a
man refuses to be caught by some dilemma about reason and passion, or
about reason and faith, or about fate and free-will, he has seen the
truth. Whenever a man declines to be cornered as an egotist, or an
altruist, or any such modern monster, he has seen the truth. For the
truth is that language is not a scientific thing at all, but wholly an
artistic thing, a thing invented by hunters, and killers, and such
artists long before science was
[Illustration: ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE.]
dreamed of. The truth is simply that--that the tongue is not a reliable
instrument, like a theodolite or a camera. The tongue is most truly an
unruly member, as the wise saint has called it, a thing poetic and
dangerous, like music or fire.
Now we can easily imagine an alternative state of things, roughly
similar to that produced in Watts’ allegories, a system, that is to say,
whereby the moods or facts of the human spirit were conveyed by
something other than speech, by shapes or colours or some such things.
As a matter of fact, of course, there are a great many other languages
besides the verbal. Descriptions of spiritual states and mental purposes
are conveyed by a variety of things, by hats, by bells, by guns, by
fires on a headland, or by jerks of the head. In fact there does exist
an example which is singularly analogous to decorative and symbolic
painting. This is a scheme of æsthetic signs or emblems, simple indeed
and consisting only of a few elemental colours, which is actually
employed to convey great lessons in human safety and great necessities
of the commonwealth. It need hardly be said that I allude to the railway
signals. They are as much a language, and surely as solemn a language,
as the colour sequence of ecclesiastical vestments, which sets us red
for martyrdom, and white for resurrection. For the green and red of the
night-signals depict the two most fundamental things of all, which lie
at the back of all language. Yes and no, good and bad, safe and unsafe,
life and death. It is perfectly conceivable that a degree of flexibility
or subtlety might be introduced into these colours so as to suggest
other and more complex meanings. We might (under the influence of some
large poetic station-masters) reach a state of things in which a certain
rich tinge of purple in the crimson light would mean “Travel for a few
seconds at a slightly more lingering pace, that a romantic old lady in a
first-class carriage may admire the scenery of the forest.” A tendency
towards peacock blue in the green might mean “An old gentleman with a
black necktie has just drunk a glass of sherry at the station
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account