Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Science; Science -- Philosophy
The physics of recent years has made heavy demands upon our capacity
for realization. The electron theory, with its analysis of matter into
“disembodied charges of electricity” required, for its understanding,
the breaking up of old habits of thought. To young students the idea
was, at first, extremely baffling――almost nonsense. To realize it one
had to make more abstract one’s idea of matter until the notion of
“substance” was replaced by the notion of “behaviour”. Anything that
behaved in the way characteristic of matter was matter. The central
idea of the restricted principle of relativity, the idea of different
time-systems, was still more difficult to grasp. In this case we had to
become convinced that our ordinary idea of simultaneity, an idea which
seemed perfectly clear, was really a bogus idea. The attacks on the
theory of relativity show, for the most part, merely that their authors
are unable to abandon old habits of thought. With the complete theory
of relativity, as we have it now, the task of adjustment has become
enormous. There cannot be, even now, more than very few scientific men
who naturally approach a problem from the point of view of relativity
theory. In most cases a conscious effort of mental preparation is
required, such as occurs when a novelist, sitting down to continue
his work, deliberately thinks himself into the appropriate frame of
mind. Yet doubtless the next generation or so will think in terms of
relativity theory as naturally as we thought in terms of the Newtonian
system. I would not hold it as impossible that the human mind may come
to realize, imaginatively as well as logically, the four-dimensional
space-time continuum. But it seems that the mind of the physicist, at
any rate, will have to do more than become familiar with relativity
theory. It will have to accommodate itself somehow to the quantum
theory for, although we can write down the laws which govern sub-atomic
phenomena and make deductions from them, these laws are, at present,
unintelligible. An electron behaves as if it had foreknowledge of
what it was about to do and could make the mathematical calculations
necessary to achieve its end. We cannot admit this to be possible, and
we can only suppose that the difficulty arises from the way we think
about things. We must learn to think in a different way, and what the
consequences of that new way of thinking will be no one can say. We
know very little of the possibilities of the development of the human
consciousness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account