Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of science — John Shaqi
Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Science; Science -- Philosophy
The proper attitude to-day in which the problem of man’s place in
nature should be approached is one of bewilderment and humility. Both
the material universe and the mind of man are very mysterious things.
At the present time it is only an inadequate mind which is confident
that it knows what is impossible. There was never a time when hearty
dogmatism and loud confidence were more out of place. We must think as
best we can, of course. The next step upward in the development of the
human consciousness will not be achieved by either slovenly credulity
or slovenly scepticism, but only by a terrifying mental travail. I
see a human mind as some multiple plant, here in full flower, there
still in the bud. Different minds have flowered in different ways.
Beethoven’s _Heiliger Dankgesang eines Genesenen an die Gottheit_
points to the complete development in him of something which those
of us who understand him have only in embryo. In those who do not
understand him it is non-existent. And the great mystics ought at least
to make us doubt whether it is we who are not deficient rather than
they who are mad. It is rash to dismiss our exceptional moods, our
strange flashes of what seems like insight, as mere whimsies without
significance. They may be faint stirrings of the next thing that is
destined to become fully alive. All that we can say is that the mind
lives in a universe largely of its own creation, and that the universe,
together with the mind, will change in ways we cannot foresee.
4
We have seen that the philosophy that regards man as a meaningless
accident in an alien universe receives no support from modern physics.
The true ground of that philosophy is now, as it always has been, the
apparently meaningless misery that forms part of life. It is not by
mistaking matter for an ultimate reality or by pondering on the fact
that laws of nature exist that we can conclude that man is of no cosmic
significance. That conclusion can be reached logically only on the
basis of arbitrary assumptions. But the conclusion is not, in fact,
reached in that way: it is reached through feeling. And it cannot
be transcended by a logical process, but only in virtue of a mystic
experience.
The old materialistic outlook, although it no longer has any scientific
justification, is still active in many branches of science. It has made
popular certain types of explanation and is the cause of the direction
pursued by certain researches. In particular it has led to a great
deal of useless or misleading work being done in the attempt to reduce
qualitative to quantitative differences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account