Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive Characters — John Shaqi
Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive CharactersSmith, George Frederick Herbert
Science
Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive Characters
Smith, George Frederick Herbert
Precious stones
The table, or some easily recognizable facet, is selected as the facet
at which light enters the stone. The telescope is first placed in the
position in which it is directly opposite the collimator (_T_{0}_ in
Fig. 23), and clamped. The scale is turned until it reads exactly
zero, 0° or 360°, and clamped. The telescope is released and revolved
in the direction of increasing readings of the scale to the position
of minimum deviation, _T_. The reading of the scale gives at once the
angle of minimum deviation, _D_. The holder carrying the stone is now
clamped to the scale, and the telescope is turned to the position,
_T_{1}_,in which the image given by reflection from the table facet is
in the centre of the field of view; the reading of the scale is taken.
The telescope is clamped, and the scale is released and rotated until
it reads the angle already found for _D_. If no mistake has been made,
the reflected image from the second facet is now in the field of view.
It will probably not be quite central, as theoretically it should be,
because the stone may not have been originally quite in the position
of minimum deviation, a comparatively large rotation of the stone
producing no apparent change in the position of the refracted image at
minimum deviation, and further, because, as has already been stated,
the method is not strictly true for biaxial stones. The difference in
readings, however, should not exceed 2°. The reading, _S_, of the scale
is now taken, and it together with 180° subtracted from the reading for
the first facet, and the value of _A_, the interior angle between the
two facets, obtained.
Let us take an example.
Reading _T_ (= _D_) 40° 41´ Reading T_{1} 261° 35´
less 180° 180 0
———————
81 35
Reading _S_ 41 30
———————
½_D_ 20 20½ _A_ 40 5
½_A_ 20 2½ ½_A_ 20 2½
———————
½(_A_ + _D_) 40 23
Log sin 40° 23´ 9.81151
Log sin 20 2½ 9.53492
———————
Log _n_ 0.27659
_n_ = 1.8906.
The readings _S_ and _T_ are very nearly the same, and therefore we may
be sure that no mistake has been made in the selection of the facets.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account