Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive CharactersSmith, George Frederick Herbert
Science
Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive Characters
Smith, George Frederick Herbert
Precious stones
In place of logarithm-tables we may make use of the diagram on Plate
II. The radial lines correspond to the angles of minimum deviation and
the skew lines to the prism angles, and the distance along the radial
lines gives the refractive index. We run our eye along the line for the
observed angle of minimum deviation and note where it meets the curve
for the observed prism angle; the refractive index corresponding to the
point of intersection is at once read off.
This method has several obvious disadvantages: it requires the use
of an expensive and elaborate instrument, an observation takes
considerable time, and the values of the principal refractive indices
cannot in general be immediately determined.
Table III at the end of the book gives the refractive indices of the
gem-stones.
[Illustration: _PLATE II_
REFRACTIVE INDEX DIAGRAM]
CHAPTER V
LUSTRE AND SHEEN
It has been already stated that whenever light in one medium falls
upon the surface separating it from another medium some of the light
is reflected within the first, while the remainder passes out into
the second medium, except when the first is of lower refractivity
than the second and light falls at an angle greater than that of
total-reflection. Similarly, when light impinges upon a cut stone
some of it is reflected and the remainder passes into the stone. What
is the relative amount of reflected light depends upon the nature of
the stone—its refractivity and hardness—and determines its lustre;
the greater the amount the more lustrous will the stone appear. There
are different kinds of lustre, and the intensity of each depends on
the polish of the surface. From a dull, _i.e._ an uneven, surface the
reflected light is scattered, and there are no brilliant reflections.
All gem-stones take a good polish, and have therefore, so long as the
surface retains its polish, considerable brilliancy; turquoise, on
account of its softness, is always comparatively dull.
The different kinds of lustre are—
(1) Adamantine, characteristic of diamond.
(2) Vitreous, as seen on the surface of fractured glass.
(3) Resinous, as shown by resins.
Zircon and demantoid, the green garnet called by jewellers “olivine,”
alone among gem-stones have a lustre approaching that of diamond. The
remainder all have a vitreous lustre, though varying in degree, the
harder and the more refractive species being on the whole the more
lustrous.
Some stones—for instance, a cinnamon garnet—appear to have a certain
greasiness in the lustre, which is caused by stray reflections from
inclusions or other breaks in the homogeneity of the interior. A pearly
lustre, which arises from cleavage cracks and is typically displayed
by the cleavage face of topaz, would be seen in a cut stone only when
flawed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account