Gems in the Smithsonian InstitutionDesautels, Paul E.
History
Gems in the Smithsonian Institution
Desautels, Paul E.
Gems; Precious stones; Smithsonian Institution
Among the rarer minerals that produce good gemstones are cordierite,
benitoite, euclase, phenakite, beryllonite, willemite, wernerite,
danburite, datolite, axinite, brazilianite, andalusite, sillimanite,
kyanite, kornerupine, enstatite, diopside, epidote, sphene, sinhalite,
and orthoclase. Willemite, a rare zinc silicate found in only a few
localities, is typical of these rarer minerals. The famous zinc mines at
Franklin, N. J., produced a few large gemmy crystals of willemite, and
some fine gemstones were cut from some of these. Willemite’s borderline
hardness of 5 to 5½ and its extreme rarity effectively eliminate it from
the gem market, but the collector who is able to obtain a good stone of
this material is indeed fortunate.
[Illustration: Exotic gems that represent collectors’ items lie
beside a 3¼-inch-long box of Russian lapis lazuli. The stones are
(left row, from top) a 28-carat andalusite from Brazil, gift of Fred
C. Kennedy, a 10-carat cordierite from Ceylon, a 29-carat apatite
from Burma, and (right row) a 42-carat brazilianite from Brazil, a
13-carat euclase from Brazil, a 29-carat wernerite from Brazil, and
a 61-carat orthoclase from Madagascar.]
Some mineral species, although beautiful when cut, and prized by
collectors, are entirely too soft, are too easily cleaved, or have some
other physical weakness that renders them useless as commercial
gemstones. Sphalerite, apatite, fluorite, calcite, cerussite, zincite,
and hematite are included in this group. Sphalerite is typical; it
produces brilliant and colorful gemstones that hold their own among
other stones of great beauty. Unfortunately, this zinc sulfide, with a
hardness of 3½ to 4, is so soft and cleaves so readily that it is very
difficult to cut properly, and it cannot be used in jewelry.
7
SOME NOTABLE GEMS IN THE COLLECTION
The Smithsonian’s collection of gems continues to grow and improve
rapidly, and it changes character constantly as important new gemstones
are added and less important ones are retired. Approximately one-third
of the gems in the collection in 1965 are itemized in the following
list. Included are some of the largest gems of each kind, some of the
more interesting stones, and some small gems notable for the places from
which they came. Though listed by species and size, some of the larger
stones are not included, and neither are most cabochons, rough opal,
beads, carvings, and spheres. The descriptions listed include, in order,
weight in carats; color; popular name or other description, if any;
place of origin; and U. S. National Museum catalog number and name of
donor. Gems in the Lea and Roebling collections usually are indicated by
the letters “L” and “R.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account