I take for example the organs that have one of their surfaces free from adhesion, because the state of the capillary system is more easily distinguished in them; but the others present the same phenomenon; we shall see that the cellular texture, certain fibrous organs, &c. &c. examined comparatively, on the one hand in animals that we dissect alive, on the other in an inflammatory state or after fine injections, present a much less number of vessels in the first, than the second case. It can then be established as an incontestable fact, that in many of the organs of the animal economy, the general capillary system is, in the ordinary state, entered in part by blood, in part by other different fluids, that appear to be white. The proportions vary singularly; thus the capillary system of the serous membranes contains hardly any blood as I have said; that of the skin more; the mucous surfaces still more, &c. But whatever may be the relation, the difference is not less real in the capillary system. Perhaps also there are always in this system empty vessels, destined to receive fluids under certain circumstances; thus the urethra, the excretory ducts in certain cases, the orifices of the lacteals in the intervals of digestion, contain nothing. It is difficult to conceive of the rapidity of the passage of the blood in the capillaries of the face, and in those of other parts of the skin, if these vessels contain a fluid, which is to be displaced by the blood. However, nothing but what is founded upon experiment can serve to decide this question. _Of the Organs in which the Capillaries do not contain Blood._ These organs are less numerous than the preceding. They are the tendons, the cartilages, the hair, certain ligaments, &c. Dissected in a living animal, not a single drop of blood escapes from these organs, and yet there is no doubt that capillaries exist in them; oftentimes very fine injections demonstrate them there. Inflammation, also, frequently fills these capillaries with blood. Into the hair, this fluid enters in the plica polonica, &c. The non-vascular appearance of these organs in the living body, is illusory; it is because their fluids are divided into very small streams, the circulation of them is more slow, and their colour different from the blood, that we cannot perceive them. II. _Difference of Organs in respect to the number of their Capillaries._ Though the capillaries exist every where, yet they are more or less numerous in the different organs; in making fine injections, it is easy to be convinced of this. What anatomist has not been struck by the prodigious number of vessels in this way developed, upon the skin, the serous surfaces, the cellular texture, &c. compared with those in the fibrous organs, in the muscles even, &c.?