As to your theory of "fluxions," I admit myself to be completely at a
loss. You seem to be assuming that a curve is made up of an infinite
number of infinitely small lines. Where is your authority for such a
statement? You append no bibliography and no references, and I cannot
find it in the literature.
Apparently, you are attempting to handle _zero_ and
_infinity_ as though they were arithmetical entities. Where did
you learn such nonsense?
My boy, please keep it in mind that four years of undergraduate work
does not qualify one as a mathematician. It is merely the first
stepping stone on the way. You have a great deal of studying yet to do,
a great many books yet to read and absorb--books, I may say, written by
men older, wiser, and more learned than yourself.
Please don't waste your time with such frivolous nonsense as toying
with symbols derived from wine barrels. No good can come out of a wine
barrel, my boy.
I hope you will soon find yourself in a position to aid me in some of
the calculations on conic sections as I outlined them to you in my
letter of the 28th December last.[1] I feel that this is important
work and will do a great deal to further your career.
With all best wishes,
Sincerely,
Isaac Barrow
[Footnote 1: This letter was either lost or returned to Dr. Barrow.--S.
H.]
* * * * *
5 January 1667
London
Dear Mr. Newton:
Thank you for your tabulations on the seven-pounder. I must say you
were very prompt in your work; there was no need to work over the
holidays.
Your questions show that you are unacquainted with the difficulties of
manufacturing military arms; I am not at all surprised at this, because
it takes years of training and practical experience in order to learn
how to handle the various problems that come up. It is something that
no university or college can teach, nor can it be learned from books;
only experience in the field can teach it, and you have had none of
that.
I can, however, explain our method of approach thus:
Each cannon to be tested is fired with several balls--some of iron,
some of lead, some of brass, and some which have been hollowed out to
make room for a charge of gunpowder in order that they may explode
upon reaching the target. With each type of ball, we find the amount
of powder required to drive the ball five yards from the muzzle of
the piece; this is considered the minimum range. (Naturally, with
the testing of hollow, explosive missiles, we do not fill them with
gunpowder, but with common earth of equal weight. To do otherwise would
endanger the cannoneer.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account