Geographic Distribution and Taxonomy of the Chipmunks of WyomingWhite, John A.
Science
Geographic Distribution and Taxonomy of the Chipmunks of Wyoming
White, John A.
Chipmunks
I am grateful to Professor E. Raymond Hall for guidance in my study
and thank Doctors Robert W. Wilson, E. Lendell Cockrum, Keith R.
Kelson, A. Byron Leonard, Rollin H. Baker, and others at the Museum
of Natural History and Department of Zoology, University of Kansas,
for encouragement and advice. My wife, Alice M. White, made the
illustrations and helped me in many ways.
For permission to borrow and to study specimens, I thank Dr. W. H.
Burt of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Miss Viola
S. Schantz of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Mr.
Colin C. Sanborn of the Chicago Natural History Museum, and Mr.
James S. Findley.
Assistance with field work is acknowledged from the Kansas
University Endowment Association, the National Science Foundation
and the United States Navy, Office of Naval Research, through
contract No. NR161 791.
VARIATION
Secondary sexual variation in chipmunks is small; the females are
slightly larger than the males. This difference in size is so slight
that it can be ignored when making taxonomic comparisons, for, large
samples of males and females of like age and from the same locality
were compared and were found statistically not to be significantly
different. This is in agreement with Johnson (1943:70) and Hall
(1946:329).
Variations of taxonomic worth are treated in the accounts of species
and subspecies.
Individual variation is slight, for, the analyses of measurements of
the skulls of series of specimens of like age, reveal markedly low
coefficients of variability resembling those published by Larrison
(1949).
The age-categories here recognized are based primarily on the structure
of the skull.
_Juveniles._--Nasals proportionally shorter and more pointed anteriorly
than in other categories; zygomatic arches more appressed to cranium;
suture separating basisphenoid and presphenoid noticeably "open";
deciduous P4 and p4 show no wear through enamel; M3 and m3 not yet
erupted; peglike deciduous P3 strongly leaning posteriorly; molars show
no wear through enamel; parietals paperlike or thin; skull convex
dorsally; 1 to 1-1/2 months of age.
_Young._--Nasals of adult proportions; zygomatic arches still
noticeably appressed anteriorly to cranium; suture between basisphenoid
and presphenoid still "open"; nasals rounded, no longer so pointed as
in juveniles; deciduous P4 and p4 show wear through enamel layer, and
in some specimens, permanent P4 and p4 can be seen beneath; roots of
deciduous P4 and p4 clearly show erosion beneath; M3 and m3 fully
erupted; peglike deciduous P3 still present; parietals noticeably
thicker and less paperlike; skull flattened (not so convex dorsally),
but not so flattened as in adults; 1-1/2 to 4 months of age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account