Meredith, George, 1828-1909 -- Criticism and interpretation
A gentleman who loved his Lamb and relished his Dickens would put up
with her for the sake of her wit and originality, accepting her as
a possible character, which I am not disposed to do. But no young
girl, with even less of Lucy’s refinement, could submit to her gross
indelicacy in that scene between them in the Isle of Wight. We know
how reticent and shy young girls have become since Juliet’s day; still
more so young brides with the most intimate of their sex--their mothers
and their sisters; how easily affronted are their susceptibilities by
the slightest trending towards ground that they so savagely regard
as sacred. It is as much as one’s life is worth almost to speak to a
very young bride about her married life; above all, if she be deeply
enamoured of her husband, and for her mother to seek to unveil it would
be a sacrilege. Mr. Meredith, who makes straight for nature divested
of the swaddling clothes of sentimentality, and prefers her mud to
the sentimentalist’s spangles and pink clouds, will perhaps say that
the excess of delicacy to which naturally sensitive and fastidious
womanhood has let itself be trained is artificial, unhealthy, and
absurd. I do not dispute that a little more of savage candour would
be an improvement to women, and that excessive delicacy leads them by
a very apparent slope into pruriency. But honesty and candour, with
modesty, are surely better than either without it, and if, for the sake
of honesty and candour, we show ourselves willing to dispense with an
excessive modesty for that of naturalness, surely we must lose one of
the nameless, and not the least, charms of maidenliness! This reproach
I make to Lucy is not only in the case of her tolerance of Mrs. Berry’s
coarse talk, but in the occupation it enters her mind to allot her
undeclared lover, Lord Montfalcon. I reproach, in fact, Mr. Meredith,
with the entire creation, all the more so as she is the only girl he
has drawn upon the old wearisome lines of masculine taste, of the
eternal old-fashioned ivy-type, commonplace, loving and pretty, without
character or interest apart from her second in the immortal duet with
his breathless hero. She is charming, as all creatures lovely to look
upon and purely natural must be charming; but the freshness of youth
and the pleasant daisy-and-buttercup flavour vanished with the years
and increasing domestic cares, what would there have remained in her
to interest us and satisfy a soaring nature like Richard’s? The affair
of the cookery-book irritates and displeases us as much as it did her
husband in the period of the moon of bliss, and the only satisfaction
we extract from it is the inimitable wise youth’s witty description
of it in his letter to Lady Blandish. Bret Harte’s speculative vision
embraced a disastrous sequel to the union of the Judge and Maud Muller
of Whittier’s poem, and we may be permitted to picture Lucy twenty
years after, with a bunch of keys at her waist, still studying the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account