Meredith, George, 1828-1909 -- Criticism and interpretation
The atmosphere of ‘Evan Harrington’ is neither that of sombre passion
nor poignant pain. It has none of the lyrical outbursts that thrill us
in ‘Richard Feverel,’ and we are spared in it any violent shaking of
the soul. We are allowed to view life more temperately, and follow the
fortunes of the characters with an undisturbed exercise of philosophic
calm and judgment. A delicious humour colours it throughout, and we are
back upon the old sea of metaphors that the writer had nearly drifted
from in the simple, undecorated strength of ‘Rhoda Fleming.’ We are
tossed about upon its topmost sprays, that sometimes drench us and
leave us in wonder whether the author will suddenly get serious and,
to use one of his own figures, announce that the curtain has fallen
upon this particular part of his performance, and expect us to cry,
‘What an exciting game it has been!’ Could anything be more boisterous
than the description of the great Mel, the tailor of Lymport? There is
a Homeric exaggeration about him that fascinates while it bewilders.
Was ever such a man drawn since the days of mythological heroes? Great
ladies loved him; he dressed himself up as a footman, and thought
nothing of setting a house on fire for the privilege of carrying in his
arms a titled beauty. He was the guest and boon fellow of lords, and
he measured them; he was a tailor, and he kept horses; he had gallant
adventures, was preposterously handsome and big and glorious; he shook
hands with his customers, and was never known to have sent in a bill.
The writer remarks: ‘Such a personage comes but once in a generation,
and when he goes, men miss the man as well as their money.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account