Meredith, George, 1828-1909 -- Criticism and interpretation
Of the story itself little need be said, as it hangs upon a single
situation unfolded in one act after a short prologue introducing us
to the chief _dramatis personæ_. And can one possibly hope to explain
how this situation is worked and twisted and unfolded--how illuminated
and ransacked to its most hidden depths for the undiscovered clue of
self, for the unrevealed spring which prompts even our everyday ‘yea’
or ‘nay’? To endeavour to do so would be to undertake a task only
second to that of the writing of ‘The Egoist.’ Meredith, I should
imagine, would shrink from it. It is simply an analysis of the Ego. The
universal Ego takes the polished and affable form of a young English
squire, the pink of perfection, and highly commendable to ladies of
fastidious tastes, the eye of whose soul is turned ceaselessly upon
self. There he walks and sits and talks before our newly-illuminated
vision, naked to the soul, each beat of the heart discovered without
its protection of flesh or garment; not one single young man whom we
meet and part with in fiction, but the large pervading personality of
human existence crystallized to one permanent shape--not Sir Willoughby
Patterne, of Patterne Hall, but the soul of selfishness endowed with a
form that might just as well have been yours or mine or our next-door
neighbour’s. This is Meredith’s most absolute triumph of art, to
which he brought all the resources of his scientific knowledge of
humanity--his powerful phraseology and marvellous metaphor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account