German literature -- 18th century -- Translations into English
[1] Page 30, Note 1.--The name “Huss” means “goose.” When Huss was
condemned to die at the stake he said:
_“Nach mir wird kommen ein Schwan, Den sollen sie ungebraten lah’n.”_
[After me a swan will rise, Whom they will not roast likewise.]
This doggerel with its grim humor on so tragic an occasion is commonly
and naturally regarded as foretelling the coming of Martin Luther.
[2] Page 55, Note 2.--Professor Wolf was the first to prove that the
Iliad and the Odyssey consisted of a number of epic poems by different
poets, which were collected under the name of Homer. For Goethe’s
feeling with regard to criticism see the translator’s book _Goethe_,
page 273.
[3] Page 60, Note 3.--This distich is addressed to Karl Philip Moritz,
author of an interesting novel in the form of an autobiography, _Anton
Reiser_.
[4] Page 61, Note 4.--This is addressed to F. H. Jacobi, who had
written two philosophical novels, _Woldemar_ and _Allwill_. The
difference between him and Moritz is sufficiently characterized in this
and the preceding distich.
[5] Page 63, Note 5.--This satirizes the sensuous novels of Timotheus
Hermes.
[6] Page 64, Note 6.--Directed against Platner, whose philosophy was
a declamation of platitudes. The distich is true of almost all the
debates that take place in literary clubs after the reading of a paper.
[7] Page 71, Note 7.--Goethe wrote this in criticism of Reichardt’s
praise of the French Revolution.
[8] Page 77, Note 8.--This and the following three distichs
are directed against Nicolai, who was the owner of a large
publishing-house, but at the same time a mediocre author, shallow and
conceited.
[9] Page 85, Note 9.--The Stolberg brothers had been liberal, but
suddenly turned Roman Catholic.
[10] Page 86, Note 10.--The pious Count Leopold Stolberg, exaggerating
the value of Christian art while deprecating classic taste, said that
he would give a whole collection of Greek urns for one Faience vase
painted in the manner of Raphael.
[11] Page 87, Note 11.--The censure is true in its general application;
but the Xenion is aimed at a man (Johann Heinrich Jung, whose _nom de
plume_ was Heinrich Stilling) who did not deserve this castigation. See
_Goethe_, page 16.
[12] Page 88, Note 12.--A severe description of Johann Caspar Lavater.
See _Goethe_, page 28.
[13] Page 89, Note 13.--Also directed against Reichardt. (See Note 7.)
[14] Pages 94 and 102, Note 14.--Schiller renders “Hades” by “Hell”
which here retains the classical meaning and does not imply the idea of
punishment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account