Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in EnglishGoethe, Johann Wolfgang von
History
Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in English
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von
Art; Literature -- History and criticism
Wilhelm had already been for some time busied with translating
_Hamlet_; making use, as he labored, of Wieland’s spirited performance,
through which he had first become acquainted with Shakespeare. What
had been omitted in Wieland’s work he replaced, and had secured a
complete version, at the very time when Serlo and he were pretty well
agreed about the way of treating it. He now began, according to his
plan, to cut out and insert, to separate and unite, to alter, and
often to restore; for, satisfied as he was with his own conception, it
still appeared to him as if, in executing it, he were but spoiling the
original.
When all was finished, he read his work to Serlo and the rest.
They declared themselves exceedingly contented with it: Serlo, in
particular, made many flattering observations.
“You have felt very justly,” said he, among other things, “that some
external circumstances must accompany this play, but that they must be
simpler than those which the great poet has employed. What takes place
without the theatre, what the spectator does not see but must imagine,
is like a background, in front of which the acting figures move. Your
large and simple prospect of the fleet and Norway will do much to
improve the play: if this were altogether taken from it, we should have
but a family scene remaining; and the great idea that here a kingly
house, by internal crimes and incongruities, goes down to ruin, would
not be presented with its proper dignity. But if the former background
were left standing, so manifold, so fluctuating and confused, it would
hurt the impression of the figures.”
Wilhelm again took Shakespeare’s part; alleging that he wrote for
islanders, for Englishmen, who generally in the distance were
accustomed to see little else than ships and voyages, the coast of
France and privateers; and thus what perplexed and distracted others
was to them quite natural.
Serlo assented; and both were of opinion that, as the play was now
to be produced upon the German stage, this more serious and simple
background was the best adapted for the German mind.
The parts had been distributed before: Serlo undertook Polonius;
Aurelia, Ophelia; Laertes was already designated by his name; a young,
thick-set, jolly newcomer was to be Horatio; the King and Ghost alone
occasioned some perplexity, for both of these no one but Old Boisterous
remaining. Serlo proposed to make the Pedant, King; but against this
our friend protested in the strongest terms. They could resolve on
nothing.
Wilhelm had also allowed both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to continue
in his play. “Why not compress them into one?” said Serlo. “This
abbreviation will not cost you much.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account