Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in EnglishGoethe, Johann Wolfgang von
History
Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in English
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von
Art; Literature -- History and criticism
“How can I keep him alive,” said Wilhelm, “when the whole play is
pressing him to death? We have already talked at large on that matter.”
“But the public wishes him to live.”
“I will show the public any other complaisance; but, as to this, I
cannot. We often wish that some gallant, useful man, who is dying
of a chronic disease, might yet live longer. The family weep, and
conjure the physician; but he cannot stay him: and no more than this
physician can withstand the necessity of nature, can we give law to
an acknowledged necessity of art. It is a false compliance with the
multitude, to raise in them emotions which they _wish_, when these are
not emotions which they _ought_, to feel.”
“Whoever pays the cash,” said Serlo, “may require the ware according to
his liking.”
“Doubtless, in some degree,” replied our friend; “but a great public
should be reverenced, not used as children are when peddlers wish to
hook the money from them. By presenting excellence to the people, you
should gradually excite in them a taste and feeling for the excellent;
and they will pay their money with double satisfaction when reason
itself has nothing to object against this outlay. The public you may
flatter, as you do a well-beloved child, to better, to enlighten it;
not as you do a pampered child of quality, to perpetuate the error you
profit from.”
In this manner various other topics were discussed relating to the
question, What might still be changed in the play, and what must of
necessity remain untouched? We shall not enter farther on those points
at present; but, perhaps, at some future time we may submit this
altered _Hamlet_ itself to such of our readers as feel any interest in
the subject.
SHAKESPEARE AD INFINITUM
(1813-16)
There has already been so much said about Shakespeare that it
would seem as if there was nothing left to say; and yet it is the
characteristic of genius ever to be stimulating other men’s genius.
In the present case I wish to consider Shakespeare from more than one
point of view,--first as a poet in general, then in comparison with the
classic and modern writers, and finally as a writer of poetic drama. I
shall attempt to work out what the imitation of his art has meant to
us, and what it can mean in the future. I shall express my agreement
with what has been written by reiterating it, and express my dissent
briefly and positively, without involving myself in conflict and
contradiction. I proceed to the first topic.
_I. Shakespeare as Poet in General_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account