Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 2, February 1852 — John Shaqi
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 2, February 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 2, February 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
of the dandies when something was “rotten in the state of Denmark.” But
even this idea of the immortal bard will scarcely assimilate to a proper
notion of our modern bucks, because the foppery natural to a Hamlet
would not be similar to that of a large City.
[Illustration: Ladies and gents looking at two dandies]
We therefore rummage the books with little success in search for
authorities upon this subject. We are constrained to a belief that
Linnæus has not classified the _genera_ or Buffon discriminated the
species. If exquisites, by reason of their sappiness, are vegetable, the
Swedish naturalist has passed over the variety—if they are animals, the
Frenchman has not given them a proper place among the _mammalia_. The
history, habits and peculiarities of these mandrakes, these “forked
radishes,” these nondescripts, who afflict the south side of Chestnut
street, Philadelphia, or the west side of Broadway, New York, has not
yet been written, but the subject has latterly assumed an importance
which can be no longer disregarded. If the comic dissector, with scalpel
in hand, were to desire the fop for a subject, he would have to wait
until he was defunct, but the dandy never dies; he is a living example
of the verity of the adage, true whenever made—“the fools are not all
dead yet”—and it is therefore impossible to imagine the time when there
will not be a dandy. We cannot consequently dissect. We may apply the
stethoscope to the chest of the exquisite; we may feel his weak pulse,
or examine his silly tongue. So may we make our diagnosis, and though we
cannot “minister to a mind diseased,” we may, at least, “hold the mirror
up to nature,” for the benefit of all gazers. Therefore, in pursuance of
the task, come we to our first great inquiry:
HOW ARE DANDIES MADE?
This is a grave question, for fops are like veal pies—in the opinion of
the waggish Weller—the crust may be rather respectable, but the making
up of the interior is “werry duberous.” Exquisites at this present
writing, are a conglomeration of lanky legs, hairy heads and creamy
countenances. Such are their natural peculiarities. But it is evident
that in considering this subject, the great topic of inquiry is, What is
a dandy sartorially? Here description will proclaim him to be a being
stuck into tight trowsers, ditto coat and vest, ditto boots, not so much
ditto overcoat, and crowned with a cylindrical structure of felt, which
is called a hat. Mentally the subject of dandyism offers little field
for remark, because the weakness which distinguishes the unfortunate
class of our fellow citizens now under consideration, is caused by
natural imbecility and want of common sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account