Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 5, May 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 5, May 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
“A formidable array of evils, indeed; but still they do not dishearten
me. As for money I do not look for it in a wife, because I should never
feel independent if I was indebted to a bride for my bread. Besides an
heiress is generally educated in such expensive habits that it requires
a fortune to satisfy her luxurious wishes. As a mere matter of business
this marrying for money is nine times out of ten a losing speculation.
You are forced to live according to your wife’s former style, and being
thus led into expenses which your income will not afford, you too often
end by becoming bankrupt. Then, too late, you discover that your wife is
fit only for a parlor; she becomes peevish, or wretched, or sick, and
perhaps all together. Domestic felicity is at an end when this occurs—”
“But her birth!”
“A still more nonsensical objection. It is one of the prejudices of the
old colonial times, and was imported from England by the servile adorers
of rank, who came over the Atlantic to assume airs in the provinces
which they dared not assume at home, and to sneer at the honester
members of society, who, instead of being like themselves drones in the
public hive, earned their bread fairly. It is this latter class to which
our country is indebted for its subsequent prosperity—a prosperity
which all the aristocrats of Europe could not have bestowed upon it. The
revolution, while it made us politically equal, did not destroy this
social aristocracy. The same exclusiveness prevails now as then, but
with even more injustice, for it is opposed to the whole spirit of our
republican institutions. Nor is this all: the prejudice itself is
ridiculous. How can people, who scarcely know their own ancestors beyond
one or two generations, and whose blood has been derived from every
nation and occupation on the globe, talk with any propriety of birth?
Why, there is scarcely a man or woman of our acquaintance, who is not an
example of this pie-bald ancestry. Take, for instance, Walter Hastings,
who, you know, boasts of his family. I happen to know all about him, for
he is a second cousin to myself. His father made a fortune, and married
into our family. But who was he? The son of a German redemptioner.
Hastings’ mother, it is true, is the grand-daughter of an English baron,
and the sister—a far higher glory—of a signer of our Declaration of
Independence. Such is a fair sample of our best families. Why I would
undertake to furnish from the ancestry of any of them either a peasant
or a peer, either a laborer or a drone. Birth, forsooth! The only
persons who boast of it in this country are generally those who have the
least claim even to an honest parentage; and the noisiest pretender to
blood I ever met with was the grandson of a fellow who was hung fifty
years ago for forgery.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account