Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon — John Shaqi
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
Meanwhile Coenus had made his circuit of the enemy’s right, and, the
Indian cavalry having already moved over towards the left, he fell
on the right flank and rear of the Indian infantry and threw it into
such confusion that it was kept inactive during the entire battle.
Then, completing his gallant ride, and with the true instinct of the
_beau sabreur_, Coenus galloped along Porus’ rear, to join the _mêlée_
already engaged on the left. To oppose Coenus as well as Alexander, the
Indian cavalry was forced to make double front. While effecting this,
Alexander drove his stoutest charge home upon them. They at once broke
and retired upon the elephants, “as to a friendly wall for refuge,”
says Arrian.
A number of these beasts were now made to wheel to the left and
charge on Alexander’s horse, but this exposed them in flank to the
phalanx, which advanced, wounded many of the animals, and killed most
of the drivers. Deprived of guidance, the elephants swerved on the
phalangites, but they were received with such a shower of darts that in
their affright they made about-face upon the Indian infantry, to the
great consternation of the latter.
The Indian cavalry, meanwhile, had rallied under the cover of the
elephants, and again faced the Macedonians. But the king renewed his
charges again and again,--it was a characteristic feat of Alexander’s,
from boyhood up, to be able to get numberless successive charges out
of his squadrons,--and forced them back under the brutes’ heels. The
Macedonian cavalry was itself much disorganized; but Alexander’s white
plume waved everywhere, and under his inspiration, Coenus having now
joined, there was, despite disorder, no let-up to the pressure, from
both fronts at once, on Porus’ harassed horse.
The situation was curious. The Macedonian cavalry, inspired by the
tremendous animation of the king, maintained its constant charges. The
Indian cavalry was huddled up close to the infantry and elephants.
These unwieldy creatures were alternately urged on the phalanx and
driven back on Porus’ line. The Macedonian infantry had plenty of
elbow-room, and could retire from them and again advance. The Indian
infantry had none. But finally the elephants grew discouraged at being
between two fires, lifted their trunks with one accord in a trumpeting
of terror, and retired out of action, “like ships backing water,” as
Arrian picturesquely describes it.
Alexander now saw that the victory was his. But the situation was still
delicate; he kept the phalanx in place and continued his charges upon
Porus’ left flank with the cavalry. Finally, Porus, who had been in the
thickest of the fray, collected forty of the yet unwounded elephants,
and charged on the phalanx, leading the van with his own huge, black,
war-elephant. But Alexander met this desperate charge with the
Macedonian archers, who swarmed around the monsters, wounded some, cut
the ham-strings of others, and killed the drivers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account