Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
Hamilcar had planned an invasion of Italy by way of the Alps; but
the scheme was left inchoate at his death. Hannibal at once began
definitely to pave the way for such an enterprise by completing the
conquest of Spain. The original conception of crossing the Alps was
Hamilcar’s, just as Philip originally planned the invasion of Asia. But
it was the fertile brain of Hannibal which gave the undertaking birth.
The colossal nature of the plan, its magnificent daring, the boundless
self-confidence and contempt of difficulty and danger which it implies,
no less than the extraordinary manner of its execution, are equalled
only by Alexander’s setting forth--also but a lad--to conquer the
illimitable possessions of the Great King.
In three years (B.C. 221–218) Hannibal had subjugated all Spain,
and after a long siege captured Saguntum. He finally set out, with
fifty thousand foot, nine thousand horse, and thirty-seven elephants,
across the Pyrenees, whence his route was almost as unknown to him
as the Atlantic to Columbus. It is impossible to follow him in this
wonderful march,--the first crossing of the Alps by any but isolated
merchants,--and probably the most daring enterprise ever set on foot.
After toils and dangers impossible to gauge, even by the losses,
Hannibal reached the Po in October, B.C. 218, with but twenty-six
thousand men and a few elephants, less than half the force with
which he had left Spain. With this handful he was to face a nation
capable with its allies of raising seven hundred thousand men; and yet
the event--as well as our knowledge of Hannibal--shows that he had
contemplated even this vast odds.
But Rome was not ready. Hannibal gained numberless confederates among
the Gauls in northern Italy, and that same fall and winter won two
victories over the Romans at the Ticinus and Trebia. Next year (B.C.
217) he again defeated the Romans, by an ambuscade at Lake Trasymene,
killing or capturing their entire army of thirty thousand men. These
three victories were due to the over-eagerness of the Roman generals
to fight, their careless methods, and Hannibal’s skill in handling his
troops and his aptness at stratagem.
The campaign preceding, and the battle of Lake Trasymene, taught
the Romans two valuable lessons. The instruction given the world by
Alexander had not reached self-important, republican Rome, though
Hannibal was familiar enough with the deeds of the great Macedonian.
The Romans knew nothing of war except crude, hard knocks. The first
lesson showed them that there is something in the art of war beyond
merely marching out to meet your enemy and beating him by numbers,
better weapons, or greater discipline.
[Illustration: HANNIBAL’S FLANK MARCH. B.C. 217]
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account