Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon — John Shaqi
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
It was thus: The Romans had retired into Etruria. In March, B.C.
217, Hannibal, who was in Liguria, desired to cross the Appenines
and move upon them. There were but two roads he could pursue. The
highway would take him across the mountains, but by a long circuit.
This was the route by which the Consul Flaminius, at Aretium, with
his forty thousand men, was expecting him, and, therefore, the way
Hannibal did not choose to march, for Flaminius could easily block the
mountain roads. The other route was so difficult that Flaminius never
dreamed that Hannibal knew of, or could by any possibility pursue it.
Hannibal’s crossing of the Alps had taught Flaminius nothing of his
daring or his skill. This route lay along the coast to near the mouth
of the Arnus, and thence up the right bank. It ran through an immense
marsh, which, for an army, was all but as difficult an obstacle as the
Alps. But it was the lesser evil, and promised the greater results;
and Hannibal chose it, as Napoleon did the Great St. Bernard in 1800.
No better description of the task can be given than to say that for
four days and three nights the army marched through water where
only the wagons, dead animals, or abandoned packs afforded the men
any chance for rest. But the Carthaginian general reached his goal,
turned Flaminius’ left flank, and cut him off from Rome. Here was the
conception of turning the enemy’s strategic flank as clearly carried
out as ever Napoleon did it. Such was lesson one.
The result of this turning manœuvre was the battle of Lake
Trasymene,--where Hannibal taught the Romans, and us through them, the
second lesson. The Romans had always marched in careless open order,
without any idea of van or rear guard, or of flankers. This Hannibal
knew. He placed his whole army in hiding at both ends of a defile at
Lake Trasymene, through which the Romans must march, in such a manner
that, when he made his attack, it was on an unsuspecting column,--in
front, rear, and one flank; and the lake being on the other flank,
the result was utter annihilation. After this the Romans marched with
proper precautions. Hannibal had inflicted three staggering blows on
his enemy.
But Rome now appointed a Dictator,--Quintus Fabius,--truly surnamed
Maximus, and nicknamed Cunctator, because, recognizing that he was
not able to cope with Hannibal on the battle-field, he wisely chose
to conduct a campaign of delays and small war, the one thing Hannibal
could not afford, but also the one thing the Romans could not tolerate
or understand; for the Romans had always won by crisp fighting. Still,
it was the policy shaped by Fabius which eventually defeated Hannibal,
and next to Hannibal himself, he was the best master the Romans then
had.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account