Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon — John Shaqi
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
In B.C. 216, Æmilius Paulus and Varro were consuls. The former was a
man of high character and attainments; Varro came of plebeian stock,
was overbearing and self-sufficient. The Roman and Carthaginian armies
lay facing each other near the Aufidus, Hannibal backing on Cannæ.
His position here had been the result of an admirable manœuvre. The
consuls commanded on alternate days. There had been a serious combat
on the last day of Varro’s command, in which the Carthaginians had
been outnumbered two to one, and been defeated. This had greatly
elated Varro, and whetted his appetite for battle. He left the troops
at evening in such a manner that next day his associate was badly
placed. Æmilius scarcely wished to withdraw, lest his men should be
disheartened; he could not remain where he was, as he was exposed
to Hannibal’s better cavalry. He took a middle course, on the whole
unwise. He sent a third of his force to the north of the Aufidus, a
trifle up-stream, to sustain some foragers he had there, and make a
secondary camp, from which to annoy Hannibal’s parties in search of
corn. This division of forces was very risky. Hannibal had long been
trying to bring the consuls to battle, and now saw that the moment had
come, for Varro was precipitate, and would probably draw Æmilius into
active measures.
[Illustration: BATTLE OF CANNÆ B.C. 216, I]
Each general made a stirring address to his army. Polybius gives both.
Hannibal’s has the true ring of the great captain. “Let us hasten into
action. I promise you victory, and, the gods willing, I will make my
promise good.” Two days later Hannibal offered Æmilius battle. But
Æmilius declined it, and Hannibal sent his Numidians to the other side
to annoy the Roman foragers. The succeeding day, knowing Varro to be
in command, Hannibal again offered battle, aware that the hot-tempered
Roman would be burning to avenge the yesterday’s taunt. He left eight
thousand men to guard his camp.
There has been much discussion as to which bank of the Aufidus was
the scene of the battle. It seems to me that the plan in the diagram
comes nearest to fitting all the statements, however conflicting, of
the several authorities. Near Hannibal’s camp the Aufidus makes a
bold, southerly sweep. Here Hannibal forded the stream in two columns,
drew up his army, and leaned his flanks on the river-banks so as to
prevent the Romans, with their numerical superiority, from overlapping
them. His front he covered with archers and slingers, so as to hide
his formation from the Roman generals. Varro, as Hannibal anticipated,
thought the Carthaginians were crossing to attack the lesser camp,
and leaving eleven thousand men to guard the larger one, with orders
to attack Hannibal’s camp during the battle, he also crossed and drew
up in the plain opposite the Carthaginians, he and every Roman in the
ranks craving to come to blows with the hated invaders.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account