Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
Varro also threw out his light troops in advance. He had sixty-five
thousand foot and seven thousand horse, to Hannibal’s thirty-two
thousand foot and ten thousand horse. He could not overlap Hannibal’s
flanks, so he determined to make his line heavier, and seek to crush
him at the first impact. He changed the formation of the maniples so
as to make them sixteen men deep and ten men front, instead of sixteen
men front by ten deep, as usual. This was a grievous error. His men
were unapt to manœuvre or fight well in this unwonted form. He should
have employed his surplus, say twenty-five thousand men, as a reserve
for emergencies. His army was in the usual three lines, fifteen legions
in all, the Roman on the right, the allied on the left. The intervals
between the maniples always equalled their front, and the distance
between the lines the depth of the maniples. The Roman cavalry,
twenty-four hundred strong, was on the right. The allied, forty-eight
hundred strong, on the left. It would have been better massed in one
body. But such was the only formation then known. Æmilius commanded the
right, Varro the left wing.
Hannibal placed on his left, opposite the Roman cavalry, his heavy
Spanish and Gallic horse, eight thousand strong, two-thirds in a
first, and one-third in a second line. This body was strong enough to
crush the Roman horse, and thus cut off the retreat of the legions
to their camps and towards Rome. In other words, Hannibal’s fighting
was to be forced on the Romans’ strategic flank. He had a perfectly
lucid idea of the value of a blow from this direction. On his right,
facing the allied cavalry, were his Numidians, two thousand strong. Of
the infantry, the Spaniards and Gauls were in the centre in alternate
bodies. His best troops, the African foot, he placed on their either
flank. He expected these veterans to leaven the whole lump. The foot
was all in phalanxes of one thousand and twenty-four men each, the
African foot in sixteen ranks, as usual, the Spaniards and Gauls in
ten. Hannibal had been obliged thus to make his centre thin, from
lack of men, but he had seething in his brain a manœuvre by which he
proposed to make this very weakness a factor of success. He had been
on the ground and had seen Varro strengthen the Roman centre. This
confirmed him in his plan.
Hannibal commanded the centre in person, Hanno the right, Hasdrubal the
left, Maharbal the cavalry of the left. Hannibal relied on Maharbal to
beat the Roman cavalry, and then, riding by the rear of the Roman army,
to join the Numidians on the Carthaginian right, like Coenus at the
Hydaspes. His cavalry was superior in numbers, and vastly outranked in
effectiveness the Roman horse.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account