Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
History
Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
Biography
Granting even that during the death-struggle of the republic it was
easier to offer resistance than in the times of Scipio or Trajan, and
that it was only in the complication of the Asiatic events with the
internal commotions of Italy that rendered it possible for Mithridates
to resist the Romans twice as long as Jugurtha did, it nevertheless
remains true that before the Parthian war he was the only enemy who gave
serious trouble to the Romans in the East, and that he defended himself
as the lion of the desert defends himself against the hunter.
But whatever judgment we may form as to the individual character of the
king, his historical position remains in a high degree significant. The
Mithridatic wars formed at once the last movement of the political
opposition offered by Hellas to Rome and the beginning of a revolt
against the Roman supremacy resting on very different and far deeper
grounds of antagonism--the national reaction of the Asiatics against the
Occidentals, a new passage in the huge duel between the West and the
East which has been transmitted from the struggle of Marathon to the
present generation, and will, perhaps, reckon its future by thousands of
years as it has reckoned its past.
LUCIUS SYLLA.
BY JAMES ANTHONY FROUDE.
[Lucius Cornelius Sulla or Sylla (Felix) dictator of Rome, born 138
B.C., died in 78. Leader of the aristocratic party in the state, he
destroyed the party of popular reform, became dictator, and
proscribed thousands of the best citizens of the republic, who were
hunted down like wild beasts. In the Social and the Samnite war, as
in the first war against Mithridates, he displayed the genius of a
great soldier, surpassing even that of his able rival Marius. He
reorganized the Roman Constitution, concentrated all power in the
hands of the senatorial oligarchy, and paved the way for Julius
Cæsar to overthrow the liberties of the republic, though the latter
belonged to the opposite party. References: Froude’s “Life of
Cæsar,” Plutarch’s “Lives,” Mommsen’s “History of Rome.”]
Lucius Sylla, a patrician of the purest blood, had inherited a moderate
fortune, and had spent it like other young men of rank, lounging in
theatres and amusing himself with dinner-parties. He was a poet, an
artist, and a wit, but each and everything with the languor of an
amateur. His favorite associates were actresses, and he had neither
obtained nor aspired to any higher reputation than that of a cultivated
man of fashion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account