The close approximation of the goddess to the god is more clearly
discernible in the Canaanite religion. On the Moabite Mesha stone,
Ashtar-Chemosh appears as a double divinity; and one of the earlier
Carthaginian inscriptions refers to a temple of Moloch-Astarte.[59.3]
Again Astarte, in the inscription on the sarcophagus of Eshmounazar of
Sidon, is called Astart-Shem-Baal, which signifies Astarte the Face of
Baal; and in the Carthaginian inscriptions the same designation occurs
for Tanit. Renan has interpreted the phrase as expressing the dogma
that the goddess is an emanation of the god, but Dr. Langdon would
explain it as arising from the close opposition of the two statues
face to face, Astart-Shem-Baal merely meaning, then, “She who fronts
Baal.” Whichever interpretation be correct, such close assimilation of
the pair might evolve here and there the concept of a bisexual
divinity. Unless the evidence of the classical writers is false, it
did so at a later period under Phoenician influences in Cyprus.
Macrobius tells us that there was in that island a statue of a bearded
deity in female dress, regarded as bisexual, and he quotes Philochoros
as witness to the fact, and to the curious phenomenon in the ritual in
which the {60} men wore female dress and the women male. This explains
Catullus’ phrase “duplex Amathusia” of the bisexual goddess. Servius
and the Christian fathers repeat the statement, and Joannes Lydus
asserts that the Pamphylians at one time worshipped a bearded
Aphrodite;[60.1] if we trust his authority, we might explain the fact
as due to late Semitic influence, which is somewhat attested by
inscriptions on the coinage of Pamphylia under the Persian
domination.[60.2] But, at the most, we can only regard this cult as a
late phenomenon, a local eccentricity, and a morbid development of a
certain vague idea that was working sporadically in the old Semitic
religion. We have no right to assert, as some have occasionally
ventured, that the Semitic peoples generally accepted the dogma of a
bisexual divinity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account