Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
In this chapter we have constantly referred to the _Poetic_ of Aristotle,
and it will be well at this point to summarize his view of the nature,
parts, and aim of tragedy. Before doing so, however, we must be clear
upon two points: the standpoint of his criticism and the value of his
evidence. It was long the habit to take this work as a kind of Bible of
poetical criticism, to accept with blind devotion any statements made
therein, or even alleged[119] to be made therein, as constituting rules
for all playwrights for ever. Now, as to the former point, the nature
of his criticism, it is simply to explain how good tragedies were as a
fact written. He takes the work of contemporary and earlier playwrights,
and in the light of this, together with his own strong common sense,
æsthetic sensibility, and private temperament, tells how he himself (for
example) would write a tragedy. On the one hand, could he have read
_Macbeth_ then, he would have condemned it; on the other, could he read
it now as a modern man, he would approve it. As to the second point, the
value of his evidence, we must distinguish carefully between the facts
which he reports and his comment thereon. The latter we should study with
the respect due to his vast merits; but he is not infallible. When, for
instance, he writes that “even a woman may be good, and also a slave;
though the woman may be said to be an inferior being, and the slave quite
worthless,”[120] and blames Euripides because “Iphigenia the suppliant
in no way resembles her later self,”[121] we shall regard him less as
helping us than as dating himself. But as to the objective facts which
he records he must be looked on as for us infallible.[122] He lived in
or close to the periods of which he writes; he commanded a vast array of
documents now lost to us; he was strongly desirous of ascertaining the
facts; his temperament and method were keenly scientific, his industry
prodigious. We may, and should, discuss his opinions; his facts we cannot
dispute. The reader will be able to appreciate for himself the statement
which follows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account