On William’s death, his son, William Rufus, succeeded to England, and
Count Robert to Normandy. On the death of William Rufus in 1100, Count
Robert was still on an expedition in the Holy Land. Hence Henry I. was
elected king by the popular voice, in spite of protests from Normandy,
and became an English as opposed to a French monarch.
This happy division of powers was, however, not permanent, and England,
Normandy and many other French provinces were reunited under the
Angevins, an event which marked the beginning of that perpetual trouble
with France which hardly ended with King Henry VI.
PLATE X.
Burning a House.
In this plate again there seems to be a rough attempt at a portrayal of
Norman domestic architecture. The Norman nature of the work is
suggested in the house being of two storeys, the Saxon dwelling usually
being of one. A woman and her child escape from the hall, which occupies
the whole of the ground floor, and is of nearly as much importance as it
would have been in the Anglo-Saxon period. The room above is smaller and
lit by a window with a Norman arch. No glass, however, would be placed
in the window. The top storey would be provided with a rough kind of
fire-place, as perhaps might also the ground floor, though the old fire
piled right up in the middle of the hall was still quite common.
PLATE XI.
The Battle, showing the “packed shield” formation of the English.
This method of fighting particularly impressed William at Hastings, and
no doubt the English employed it with great skill. But whereas the most
important part of William’s army was the cavalry, Harold’s army
consisted entirely of foot soldiers. The Thanes and other important men
might be able to ride up to the scene of battle on horseback, but they
dismounted for the fight. The “packed shield” formation they proceeded
to employ consisted, as is seen in the Tapestry, of a thick wedge of
men, widening out from about two in front to an uncertain number at the
base; the officers and better armed men formed the front wedge, backed
by a dense column of the inferior troops.
The English and Normans wear for the most part the same armour, the body
of which goes down to the knees in one piece, a type of armour known as
the “hauberk” or “byrnie.” These hauberks occasionally extended to the
ankles, but the legs were generally cased in leather gaiters, somewhat
resembling the “puttees” of to-day. Later, in the border, the hauberk is
correctly shown being pulled off the body of a dead soldier over the
head, like a shirt.
In most cases the shields of the two armies are of the same shape, being
pointed at the bottom and rounded at the top, a type that succeeded the
kind which was narrow at each end and broadest in the middle. This
old-fashioned shape of shield was still used by the English as well as
the round embossed shield of yet earlier times.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account