Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
In 1748 George II. happened to see that gallant French equestrian, the
Duchess of Bedford, on horseback, in a riding-habit of blue turned up
with white. At that time there was a discussion on foot, touching a
general uniform for the navy: the appearance of the Duchess settled the
question. George II. was so delighted with her Grace’s appearance, that
he commanded the adoption of those colours; and that accounts perhaps
for the fact, that sailors on a spree are ever given to getting upon
horseback, where they do not at all look like the Duchess whose colours
they wear.
Taste was undoubtedly terribly perverted in this century. Some ladies
took their footmen with them into their box at the play; others married
actors, and their noble fathers declared they would have more willingly
pardoned their daughters had they married lacqueys rather than players.
A daughter of the Earl of Abingdon married Gallini the ballet-master,
of whom George III. made a “Sir John”; and Lady Harriet Wentworth did
actually commit the madness of marrying her footman,—a madness that had
much method in it. This lady, the daughter of Lord Rockingham, transacted
this matter in the most business-like way imaginable. She settled a
hundred a year for life on her husband, but directed her whole fortune
besides to pass to her children, should she have any; otherwise, to her
own family. She moreover “provided for a separation, and ensured the
same pin-money to Damon, in case they part.” She gave away all her fine
clothes, and surrendered her titles: “linen and gowns,” she said, “were
properest for a footman’s wife;” and she went to her husband’s family in
Ireland as plain Mrs. Henrietta Sturgeon.
It is characteristic of the manners of this period, that Lady Harriet
Wentworth, in marrying her footman, was not considered as having so
terribly _dérogé_ as Lady Susan Fox, Lord Ilchester’s daughter, who in
the same year, 1764, married O’Brien the actor, a man well to do, and
who owned a villa at Dunstable. The actor had contrived something of
the spirit of farce in carrying out his plot. He succeeded so well in
imitating the handwriting of Lady Susan’s dearest friend, Lady Sarah
Bunbury, that Lord Ilchester delivered the letters to his daughter with
his own hand, and without suspicion. The couple used to meet at Miss
Read’s, the artist;—that is, Catherine Read, who painted whole bevies
of our grandmothers, and whose portraits of young Queen Charlotte and
of that dreadful woman Mrs. Macauley (represented as a Roman matron
weeping over the lost liberties of her country) were the delight of both
connoisseurs and amateurs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account