Harmonies of Political Economy: Translated from the Third French Edition, with a Notice of the Life and Writings of the AuthorBastiat, Frédéric
Philosophy
Harmonies of Political Economy: Translated from the Third French Edition, with a Notice of the Life and Writings of the Author
Bastiat, Frédéric
Economics
Our heaths will be covered with resinous trees. Numerous swarms of
bees will, on the mountains, gather perfumed treasures, now wasting
their fragrance on the desert air, like the flowers from which
they are derived. No branch of agriculture but will then exhibit a
cheering development.
The same remark applies to navigation. Thousands of vessels will
proceed to the whale fishery; and, in a short time, we shall possess
a navy capable of maintaining the honour of France, and gratifying
the patriotic aspirations of your petitioners, the undersigned
Candlemakers and others.
But what shall we say of the manufacture of ‹articles de Paris›?
Henceforth you will behold gildings, bronzes, crystals, in
candlesticks, in lamps, in lustres, in candelabra, shining forth, in
spacious warerooms, compared with which those of the present day can
be regarded but as mere shops.
No poor ‹Resinier› from his heights on the sea-coast, no Coal-miner
from the depth of his sable gallery, but will rejoice in higher
wages and increased prosperity.
Only have the goodness to reflect, Gentlemen, and you will be
convinced that there is, perhaps, no Frenchman, from the wealthy
coal-master to the humblest vender of lucifer matches, whose lot
will not be ameliorated by the success of this our Petition.
We foresee your objections, Gentlemen, but we know that you can
oppose to us none but such as you have picked up from the effete
works of the partisans of Free Trade. We defy you to utter a single
word against us which will not instantly rebound against yourselves
and your entire policy.
You will tell us that, if we gain by the protection which we seek,
the country will lose by it, because the consumer must bear the loss.
We answer:
You have ceased to have any right to invoke the interest of the
consumer; for, whenever his interest is found opposed to that of the
producer, you sacrifice the former. You have done so for the purpose
of ‹encouraging labour› and ‹increasing employment›. For the same
reason, you should do so again.
You have yourselves obviated this objection. When you are told
that the consumer is interested in the free importation of iron,
coal, corn, textile fabrics,—yes, you reply, but the producer is
interested in their exclusion. Well, be it so;—if consumers are
interested in the free admission of natural light, the producers of
artificial light are equally interested in its prohibition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account