Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
Different professors of ventriloquism have given different accounts
of the manner in which they succeeded in producing their illusions.
Baron Mengen, one of the household of Prince Lichtenstein, at
Vienna, said that it consisted in a passion for counterfeiting the
cries of animals and the voices of different persons. M. St. Gille
referred his art to mimicry; and the French Academy, combining these
views, defines the art as consisting in an accurate imitation of any
given sound as it reaches the ear. Scientific solutions are various.
Mr. Nicholson thought that artists in this line, by continual
practice from childhood, acquire the power of speaking during
inspiration with the same articulation as the ordinary voice, which
is formed by expiration. M. Richerand declares that every time a
professor exhibits his vocal peculiarities, he suffers distension in
the epigastric region; and supposes that the mechanism of the art
consists in a slow, gradual expiration, drawn in such a way, that
the artist either makes use of the influence exerted by volition
over the parietes of the thorax, or that he keeps the epiglottis
down by the base of the tongue, the apex of which is not carried
beyond the dental arches. He observes, that ventriloquists possess
the power of making an exceedingly strong inspiration just before
the long expiration, and thus convey into the lungs an immense
quantity of air, by the artistical management of the egress of which
they produce such astonishing effects upon the hearing and
imagination of their auditors.
The theory propounded by Mr. Gough in the "Manchester Memoir," on
the principle of reverberated sound, is untenable, because
ventriloquism on that theory would be impossible in a crowded
theatre, which admits not of the predicated echoes. Mr. Love, in his
account of himself, asserts a natural aptitude, a physical
predisposition of the vocal organs; which, in his case, discovered
itself as early as the age of ten, and gradually improved with
practice, without any artistic study whatever. He states that not
only his pure ventriloquisms, but nearly all his lighter vocal
imitations of miscellaneous sounds, were executed in the first
instance on the spur of the moment, and without any pre-meditation.
The artist must evidently possess great flexibility of larynx and
tongue. Polyphony, according to our modern professor, is produced
by compression of the muscles of the chest, and is an act entirely
different from any species of vocal deception or modulation. There
is no method, he tells us, of manufacturing true ventriloquists.
Nature must have commenced the operation, by placing at the artist's
disposal a certain quality of voice adapted for the purpose, as the
raw material to work upon. It is like a fine ear or voice for
singing--the gift of Nature. It follows, therefore, that an expert
polyphonist must be as rare a personage as any other man of genius
in any particular art.
THE INCENDIARY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account