Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
At length at the expiration of that time the buildings of the
establishment having become very old, and being often greatly
damaged, and the lives of the inmates seriously endangered by the
shocks of earthquakes and the volcanic eruptions to which their
situation so near to Mt. Etna exposed them, it was determined to
remove the institution to another place, several miles distant from
its original location, where the ground was more secure. The old
picture of Elijah was however found to be too much decayed to be
removed. A careful copy of it was therefore made, the artist taking
care to transfer, as nearly as possible, to his copy, both the
features and the costume of the original. The following engraving is
a faithful representation of this portrait and of the dress which
became the subject of the dispute, except of course that the colors
are not shown. The shoulders are covered with a cloak which in the
painting was red. Beneath the cloak was a tunic, formed of the skin
of some animal, which descended to the knees. There were sandals on
the feet. There was a sword tipped with flame in the hand, and the
head was covered with a red cap trimmed with ornaments of gold.
[Illustration: THE ELIJAH OF THE BASILIANS.]
This painting in its original state had hung in its place in the old
convent during the whole six hundred years without attracting any
special notice; but when the copy was made and hung up in the new
convent, it became an object of greater attention, and the
Carmelites who saw or heard of it were much displeased with the
costume, inasmuch as it was not the costume of their order. The
painting by exhibiting the prophet in such a dress, seemed to deny
that Elijah had been a Carmelite, and to claim him as belonging to
some other order. They complained to the Basilians of the injustice
done them, and demanded that the obnoxious costume should be
changed. Finding, however, that their complaints and remonstrances
were unavailing, they appealed to the Archbishop of Sicily, praying
him to interpose his authority to redress the injury which they were
suffering, and to compel the Basilians to take down the painting in
question, the display of which was so dishonorable to the ancient
order of Mt. Carmel. The Basilians in reply alleged that the costume
of the portrait was no innovation of theirs, and they were not
responsible for it at all. The work, they said, was a faithful copy
of an ancient painting that had hung for six hundred years,
unquestioned and uncomplained of, in their former monastery, and
that they could not give up the ancient traditions and relics of
their institution; and they were especially unwilling to consent
that the prophet Elijah should be represented in their church in a
Carmelite dress, since that would prejudice the ancient claims of
the Basilian order.
SETTLEMENT OF THE DISPUTE.
[Illustration: THE AUTHORIZED ELIJAH.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account