Harvey's Views on the Use of the Circulation of the BloodCurtis, John Green
History
Harvey's Views on the Use of the Circulation of the Blood
Curtis, John Green
Blood -- Circulation; Harvey, William, 1578-1657
"make a cut in the trachea of a living dog, forcibly fill the
lungs with air by means of a bellows and, when they have been
distended, apply a firm ligature, on opening the chest shortly
after, he would find great abundance of air in the lungs, up to
their outermost tunic, but none at all in the venous artery or
in the left ventricle of the heart. If in the living dog the
heart drew air out of the lungs or the lungs transmitted it,
much more ought they to do so in this experiment. Who, indeed,
could doubt that even in a dissection, if the lungs of a dead
body had been inflated, air would enter at once, as aforesaid,
did any passages exist?"[71]
Yet we have found Aristotle, more than nineteen centuries before
Harvey, recognizing that no passages are needed for the transfer of
air out of the windpipe, and saying, of the channels from the heart,
that "it is by contact that they receive the breath[72] and transmit
it to the heart."[73] Moreover, sixty-nine years before Harvey's
publication Columbus had repeatedly recommended the experiment of
opening the venous artery[20] in a living dog and noting that the
"said venous artery" is full of blood, not of air or fumes. But
Columbus held this observation rather to confirm than to disprove
his doctrine that the blood in the venous artery is imbued with
vital spirits derived in the lungs from the substance of the air.
Indeed, he goes so far as to call the contents of this vessel
"modified blood and air."[74] In this matter the earlier observer,
Columbus, shows keener insight than the later, Harvey.
Decidedly, however, the stage waits for the chemists, despite
Harvey's poor opinion of them. Despite that poor opinion, too,
Harvey himself turns to making chemical conjectures in the next
passage of his note-book, to the study of which latter we will now
return. The passage is as follows:--
"Conclusion. Opinion of W. H.
"In animals in which lungs are fleshy and full of blood these
concoct the blood, seeing that spirits and blood are one
thing, in the same way that the liver does and by reason of
the same arguments; indeed, the lungs may rather detain fatty
and oleaginous vapor by a cooling process, as oil or balsam or
nutritious fat is cooled in alembic and serpentina"[75]--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account