Henry Gally : $b A critical essay on characteristic-writings from his translation of The moral characters of Theophrastus (1725) — John Shaqi
Henry Gally : $b A critical essay on characteristic-writings from his translation of The moral characters of Theophrastus (1725)Gally, Henry
General
Henry Gally : $b A critical essay on characteristic-writings from his translation of The moral characters of Theophrastus (1725)
Gally, Henry
Characters and characteristics in literature; Theophrastus. Characters
I am not conscious of having made any great Excursions beyond the
Bounds which these Rules prescrib’d to me, unless it is in the Chapter
concerning _Superstition_. And even here, unless the Commentary had
been somewhat copious, the Text it self wou’d have appear’d like a
motly Piece of mysterious Nonsense. Thus much I thought my self
oblig’d to do in Justice to _Theophrastus_; and as for the
Enlargements which I have made, over and above what wou’d have
satisfy’d this Demand, they will not, ’tis hop’d, be unacceptable to
the curious Reader. They are Digressions I own; but I shall not here
offer to make one Digression to execute another, or, according to the
Custom and Practice of modern Authors, beg a thousand Pardons of the
Reader, before I am certain of having committed one Offence. Such a
Procedure seems preposterous. For when an Author happens to digress,
and take a Trip ὑπὲρ τὰ ἐσκαμμένα, beyond the Bounds prescrib’d;
the best, the only consistent thing he can do, is to take his Chance
for the Event. If what he has said does not immediately relate to the
Matter in Hand, it may nevertheless be _a propos_, and good in its
Kind; and then instead of Censure, he will probably meet with Thanks;
but if it be not good, no prefatory Excuses will make it so: And
besides, it will ever be insisted on, that ’tis an easier Matter to
strike out bad Digressions, than it is to write good
Apologies.
One Word more, and then I have done. Since Mr. _Budgell_ has thought
fit to censure Mr. _de la Bruyere_, for troubling his Reader with
_Notes_, I think my self oblig’d, in order to justify both Mr. _de la
Bruyere_ and my self, to shew that this Censure is very unreasonable,
and very unjust.[D] Mr. _Budgell’s_ Words are as follow.
_Theophrastus_, at the Time he writ, referr’d to nothing but what
was well known to the meanest Person in _Athens_; but as Mr. _Bruyere_
has manag’d it, by hinting at too many _Grecian_ Customs, a modern
Reader is oblig’d to peruse one or two _Notes_, which are frequently
longer than the Sentence it self he wou’d know the meaning of. But if
those Manners and Customs, which _Theophrastus_ alludes to, were, in
his Time, well known to the meanest _Athenian_, it does not follow
that they are now so well known to a modern Reader.
[D: Preface to his Translation of _Theophrastus_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account