James, Henry, 1843-1916 -- Criticism and interpretation
The analytic tendency seems to have increased with him as his work has
gone on. Some of the earlier tales were very dramatic: "A Passionate
Pilgrim," which I should rank above all his other short stories, and
for certain rich poetical qualities, above everything else that he has
done, is eminently dramatic. But I do not find much that I should call
dramatic in "The Portrait of a Lady," while I do find in it an amount
of analysis which I should call superabundance if it were not all such
good literature. The novelist's main business is to possess his reader
with a due conception of his characters and the situations in which
they find themselves. If he does more or less than this he equally
fails. I have sometimes thought that Mr. James's danger was to do
more, but when I have been ready to declare this excess an error of his
method I have hesitated. Could anything be superfluous that had given
me so much pleasure as I read? Certainly from only one point of view,
and this a rather narrow, technical one. It seems to me that an
enlightened criticism will recognize in Mr. James's fiction a
metaphysical genius working to aesthetic results, and will not be
disposed to deny it any method it chooses to employ. No other
novelist, except George Eliot, has dealt so largely in analysis of
motive, has so fully explained and commented upon the springs of action
in the persons of the drama, both before and after the facts. These
novelists are more alike than any others in their processes, but with
George Eliot an ethical purpose is dominant, and with Mr. James an
artistic purpose. I do not know just how it should be stated of two
such noble and generous types of character as Dorothea and Isabel
Archer, but I think that we sympathize with the former in grand aims
that chiefly concern others, and with the latter in beautiful dreams
that primarily concern herself. Both are unselfish and devoted women,
sublimely true to a mistaken ideal in their marriages; but, though they
come to this common martyrdom, the original difference in them remains.
Isabel has her great weaknesses, as Dorothea had, but these seem to me,
on the whole, the most nobly imagined and the most nobly intentioned
women in modern fiction; and I think Isabel is the more subtly divined
of the two. If we speak of mere characterization, we must not fail to
acknowledge the perfection of Gilbert Osmond. It was a profound stroke
to make him an American by birth. No European could realize so fully
in his own life the ideal of a European dilettante in all the meaning
of that cheapened word; as no European could so deeply and tenderly
feel the sweetness and loveliness of the English past as the sick
American, Searle, in "The Passionate Pilgrim."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account