Margaret of Parma openly showed her delight when Granvelle was
banished, for she felt herself relieved from a tyrant. She now gave
her confidence to Orange, who was very popular with the people. There
seemed to be some hope of inducing Philip to withdraw some of the
edicts against his Protestant subjects. Their cries were daily
becoming louder, and there was an uneasy spirit abroad in the Low
Countries which greeted with {81} delight the device of Count Egmont
for a new livery for his servants that should condemn the ostentation
of such ministers as Granvelle. His retainers appeared in doublet and
hose of the coarsest grey material, with long hanging sleeves and no
embroideries. They wore an emblem of a fool's cap and bells, or a
monk's cowl, which was supposed to mock the Cardinal's contemptuous
allusion to the nobles as buffoons. The King was furious at the
fashion which soon spread among the courtiers. They changed the device
then to a bundle of arrows or a wheat-sheaf which, they asserted,
denoted the union of all their hearts in the King's service.
Schoolboys could not have betrayed more joy in the absence of their
pedagogue than the whole court showed when Granvelle left the country
in 1564 on a pretended visit to his mother.
Orange had now three aims in life, to convoke the States-General, to
moderate or abolish the edicts, and to suppress both council of finance
and privy council, leaving only the one council of state, which he
could make the body of reform. By this time the persecutions were
rousing the horror of Catholic as well as Calvinist. The prisons were
crowded with victims, and through the streets went continual
processions to the stake. The four estates of Flanders were united in
an appeal to Philip. Egmont was to visit Spain and point out the
uselessness of forcing the Netherlands to accept religious decrees
which reduced them to abject slavery. Before he set out, William of
Orange made a notable speech, declaring the provinces free and
determined to vindicate their freedom.
Egmont's visit was a failure, since he suffered himself to be won by
the flattery of Philip II. He was reproached with having forgotten the
interests of the State when {82} he returned, and was consumed by
regrets that were unavailing. The wrath of the people was increasing
daily as the cruel persecution devastated the Low Countries. All other
subjects were forgotten in the time of agony and expectation. There
was talk of resistance that would win death on the battlefield, more
merciful than that proceeding from slow torture. In streets, shops,
and taverns men gathered to whisper of the dark deeds done in the name
of the Inquisition. Philip had vowed "never to allow myself either to
become or to be called the lord of those who reject Thee for their
Lord," as he prostrated his body before a crucifix. The doom of the
Protestants had been sealed by that oath. Henceforth, those who feared
death were known to favour freedom of religion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account