Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
Of course on Henry IV. succeeding, the crown resumed the ownership of
the fortress, and thus it continued, often enlivened by the visits
of royalty, until the days of Elizabeth, who bestowed it on her
favourite, Robert Dudley, fifth son of the Duke of Northumberland,
with all the royalties thereto belonging. Without enlarging on the
history of this courtier, it is enough to say that he seems to have
expended the enormous emoluments derived from the many dignities with
which Elizabeth overwhelmed him in his lavish outlay upon Kenilworth.
The additions and alterations made there by this Dudley involved an
expenditure of £60,000--an incredible sum in those days. He erected
the great gatehouse on the north, also the mass of square rooms from
the north-east angle of the upper court, the buildings, called after
him, and the gallery and lower gatehouse towers, together with a
great range of stabling. He removed the Norman windows from the keep,
replacing them by more modern ones; and it is evident that the great
object of his outlay was to provide magnificent accommodation for the
entertainment of his Queen and her Court.
This reception took place in July, 1575, and the festivities were
continued for seventeen days during which every sort of prodigal
extravagance possible at that age was indulged in. It cost Leicester
£1,000 a day. At his death he bequeathed the castle to his brother
Ambrose, Earl of Warwick, for life, and afterwards to his own son Sir
Robert Dudley, upon whose birth and legitimacy the father (who is
certainly one of the dark characters in English history) chose to throw
doubts.
This seems to have incited that greedy monarch, James I., to refuse
the succession to Sir Robert, whom he forced to consent to a nominal
sale of the property to Henry, Prince of Wales, at one-third of its
value, and even that was never paid. Dudley, in disgust, withdrew from
England, and lived in much honour at Florence, when he died about the
year 1650.
When the place fell into the hands of Oliver Cromwell, a sort of
commission of army officers was sent to Kenilworth to divide and share
the property between them, and they, caring nothing for historical
associations, the splendour of the structure, or the richness of the
furniture and plenishing (it was but seventy-five years after the
entertainment of Elizabeth there) proceeded to strip the place, to cut
the timber, kill the deer, and even to sell the walls and roofing, for
the value of the bare materials.
At the restoration, Charles II. granted the reversion of the manor
to Lawrence, Lord Hyde, second son of Chancellor Clarendon, whom he
created Baron Kenilworth and Earl of Rochester. His grandson leaving
only a daughter, the lands and ruins came by marriage to the Essex
family and, afterwards, by marriage to Thomas Villiers, the second son
of the Earl of Jersey, created, in 1756, Baron Hyde, in whose family
they still continue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account