Historical Record of the Seventy-Third Regiment: Containing an account of the formation of the Regiment from the period of its being raised as the Second Battalion of the Forty-Second Royal Highlanders in 1780 and of its subsequent services to 1851Cannon, Richard
History
Historical Record of the Seventy-Third Regiment: Containing an account of the formation of the Regiment from the period of its being raised as the Second Battalion of the Forty-Second Royal Highlanders in 1780 and of its subsequent services to 1851
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army. Regiment of Foot, 73rd -- History
On the 20th of April an attack was made on an entrenchment of
the enemy, about six o’clock in the evening. Colonel Sherbroke,
commanding the advanced posts, directed the attack. Three different
columns were to advance at the same time from Macdonald’s post;
one to the left, under Lieut.-Colonel Michael Monypenny, of the
SEVENTY-THIRD, consisting of four companies of that regiment, and
four of the Bengal volunteers, was to proceed along the bank of the
river Cavery, and to turn the right flank of the enemy’s entrenched
post. Another, to the right, consisting of the flank companies of
the twelfth regiment, and two companies of Bengal volunteers, under
Lieut.-Colonel Gardiner, was to move along Macdonald’s nullah,
and to turn the enemy’s left. The centre column, composed of six
companies of the SEVENTY-THIRD, and four of the Bengal volunteers,
under Brevet Lieut.-Colonel the Honorable George St. John, (Major
of the SEVENTY-THIRD regiment), was directed to make a feint,
which was to be converted into a real attack, should it be deemed
expedient.
The three columns at dusk, advanced under a well-directed fire from
the guns which commanded the entrenchment. The enemy’s resistance
was unavailing, and the several attacks were completely successful.
It was afterwards ascertained, that the enemy had two hundred
and fifty men in killed and wounded, and it is remarkable, that
although about eighteen hundred of Tippoo’s infantry occupied
the entrenchment, the British, in this attack, had only one man
wounded.[7]
The siege of Seringapatam was prosecuted with vigour. On the 26th
of April, the SEVENTY-THIRD had Lieutenant James Todd wounded; and
Lieutenant Archibald John Maclean was wounded on the following day.
A breach being reported practicable on the 3rd of May, the assault
was ordered, and the SEVENTY-THIRD regiment was selected to take
part in this enterprise, which was ordered to be commenced in the
heat of the following day, as the enemy’s troops would then be the
least prepared to oppose the attack.
The assault took place about half-past one o’clock in the afternoon
of the 4th of May, and the troops for this service, commanded
by Major-General David Baird, were divided into two columns of
attack. The SEVENTY-THIRD, with the seventy-fourth regiment,
four European flank companies, fourteen Sepoy flank companies,
with fifty artillerymen, formed the right column, under Colonel
Sherbroke. Each column was preceded by one serjeant and twelve men,
volunteers, supported by an advanced party of one subaltern and
twenty-five men. A brigade of engineers, under Captain Caldwell,
accompanied the storming party; Lieutenant James Farquhar, of the
seventy-fourth, commanded the European pioneers, and Lieutenant
John Lalor, of the SEVENTY-THIRD, both of whom had examined the
ford, conducted the columns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account