The characteristics of nations, as of races, are fairly accurately
reflected linguistically in the metaphors and idioms they choose, in
their tricks of grammar, in their various ways of forming new words.
It is, for obvious reasons, easier to apply this principle to other
nations than to one’s own; nevertheless there are a few such points
which English people can observe even in the English language. The
number of words and expressions drawn from sport is a phenomenon
which has already been touched upon, and it is at any rate a question
whether humour has not played a larger part in the creation of
English and American words than in those of other languages. The
French ‘tête’[21] is humorous in origin, and there must be other
French and Latin-French words with a similar history, but English has
really quite a number of words in which humour has taken a hand. One
way in which this comes about is the process known as back-formation.
We realize the humorous intention when somebody invents from the noun
_swashbuckler_ a verb to _swashbuckle_, or to _buttle_ and _cuttle_
from _butler_ and _cutler_, but it is not so well known that the same
process (probably with the same humorous intent behind it) gave us
such sober words as _burgle_, _sidle_, _edit_, _grovel_, _beg_, and
_greed_. One of the most interesting back-formations is the verb to
_maffick_, formed from the supposed present participle _mafficking_,
which was coined to describe the festivities that greeted the arrival
in London of the news of the relief of Mafeking during the Boer War.
The well-known humorous device of understatement is responsible for
the modern meaning of _hit_ and most of its synonyms. The notion
of striking was once conveyed by the verb to _slay_; by Tudor
times, however, _smite_, which in Old English meant to ‘smear’ or
‘rub over’, had become the commoner word. _Strike_ itself in Old
English meant ‘to stroke’ or ‘to rub gently’, and _hit_, which is
now universal in serious colloquial speech, meant to ‘meet with’ or
‘light upon’—‘not to miss’, in fact; just as to _win_ (‘not to lose’)
something means, or recently meant, in the British Army, to _steal_
it. _Blow_ and _thrash_ are both sly agricultural metaphors, and the
present popularity of such slang phrases as _wipe_, meaning a blow,
and to _wipe out_, suggests that this pleasing and rather simple form
of humour is still active in English word-formation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account