History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
Externally the temple is enclosed by a wall 20 ft. in height, and
possessing four gopuras, one on each face, which have this peculiarity,
that they alone, of all those I know in India, are built wholly of stone
from the base to the summit. The western one (D) alone, however, is
finished, and owing apparently to the accident of its being in stone, it
is devoid of figure-sculpture--some half-dozen plaster casts that now
adorn it having been added quite recently. Those on the north and south
(A and C) are hardly higher than the wall in which they stand, and are
consequently called the ruined gateways. Such a thing is, however, so
far as I know, unknown in southern India. Partly from their form, and
more from the solidity of their construction, nothing but an earthquake
could well damage them, and their age is not such as would superinduce
ruin from decay of material. These, in fact, have never been raised
higher, and their progress was probably stopped in the beginning of the
last century, when Mahomedan, Mahratta, and other foreign invaders
checked the prosperity of the land, and destroyed the wealth of the
priesthood. The eastern façade has two entrances and two gopuras. The
smaller, not shown in the plan, is finished. The larger one (B in the
plan) never was carried higher than we now see it. Had it been
finished,[386] it would have been one of the largest of its class, and
being wholly in stone, and consequently without its outline being broken
by sculpture, it would have reproduced more nearly the effect of an
Egyptian propylon than any other example of its class in India.
The glory, however, of this temple resides in its corridors. These, as
will be seen by the plan, extend to nearly 4000 feet in length. The
breadth varies from 20 ft. to 30 ft. of free floor space, and their
height is apparently about 30 ft. from the floor to the centre of the
roof. Each pillar or pier is compound, and richer and more elaborate in
design than those of the Parvati porch at Chillambaram (Woodcut No.
197), and are certainly more modern in date.
[Illustration: 201. Central Corridor, Ramisseram. (From a Photograph.)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account