History of King Charles the First of EnglandAbbott, Jacob
History
History of King Charles the First of England
Abbott, Jacob
Charles I, King of England, 1600-1649; Great Britain -- History -- Charles I, 1625-1649; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography
The king was more and more seriously alarmed. He found that the storm
of public odium and indignation was too great for him to withstand.
He began to fear for his own safety more than ever. He removed from
Hampton Court to Windsor Castle, a stronger place, and more remote
from London than Hampton Court; and he now determined to give up the
contest. He sent a message, therefore, to the House, saying that,
on further reflection, since so many persons had doubts whether
his proceedings against the five members were consistent with the
privileges of Parliament, he would waive them, and the whole subject
might rest until the minds of men were more composed, and then, if
he proceeded against the accused members at all, he would do so in a
manner to which no exception could be taken. He said, also, he would
henceforth be as careful of their privileges as he should be of his own
life or crown.
[Sidenote: Increasing excitement.]
Thus he acknowledged himself vanquished in the struggle, but the
acknowledgment came too late to save him. The excitement increased,
and spread in every direction. The party of the king and that of
the Parliament disputed for a few months about these occurrences,
and others growing out of them, and then each began to maneuver and
struggle to get possession of the military power of the kingdom. The
king, finding himself not safe in the vicinity of London, retreated to
York, and began to assemble and organize his followers. Parliament sent
him a declaration that if he did not disband the forces which he was
assembling, they should be compelled to provide measures for securing
the peace of the kingdom. The king replied by proclamations calling
upon his subjects to join his standard. In a word, before midsummer,
the country was plunged in the horrors of civil war.
[Sidenote: Civil war.]
[Sidenote: Its nature.]
A civil war, that is, a war between two parties in the same country,
is generally far more savage and sanguinary than any other. The hatred
and the animosities which it creates, ramify throughout the country,
and produce universal conflict and misery. If there were a war between
France and England, there might be one, or perhaps two invading armies
of Frenchmen attempting to penetrate into the interior. All England
would be united against them. Husbands and wives, parents and children,
neighbors and friends, would be drawn together more closely than ever;
while the awful scenes of war and bloodshed, the excitement, the
passion, the terror, would be confined to a few detached spots, or to a
few lines of march which the invading armies had occupied.
[Sidenote: Cruelties and miseries of civil war.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account