History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 1 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 1 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
A few notices remain to us of the time occupied in the performance of
different voyages by ancient vessels, from which we may deduce the
general fact, that though owing to their construction—being generally
from three to four times as long as they were broad, with shallow
keels, and rarely other than square sails—they could not have made
much way _on_ a wind, they were capable of considerable speed when
the wind was right aft. Thus Pliny states that a merchant-ship passed
from Messina to Alexandria in six days; another from the Pillars of
Hercules to Ostia in seven; another from the nearest port of Spain
in four; another from Narbonne in three, and another from Africa in
two.[55] So, too, Arrian relates that the ship in which he sailed on
the Euxine accomplished five hundred stadia (or, as is more probable,
three hundred stadia) before mid-day;[56] and St. Luke tells us that he
ran from Rhegium to Puteoli (one hundred and eighty-two miles) by the
second day after he had started:[57] but, in all these cases, we may be
quite sure that the sailors had (as St. Luke distinctly states was his
case) a good stiff breeze abaft.
[Illustration: ANCIENT CARAVAN AND OTHER ROUTES.
_Engraved for Lindsay’s History of Merchant Shipping._
_Stanford’s Geog. Estabt. 6 & 7 Charing Cross_
London: Sampson Low, Marston, Low, & Searle.]
FOOTNOTES:
[1] See a good passage in Claudian’s “Rape of Proserpine,” on this
subject; and Virgil, Georg. i. 136.
[2] Noah’s Ark, B.C. 2348.
[3] Gen. vi. 15.
[4] Gen. vii. 16, 17. Cory, “Ancient Fragm.,” for traditions of the Ark
in various lands.
[5] The Scriptural narrative of a great flood, and of a great vessel
to float upon it, has just met with a remarkable confirmation. At a
meeting of the Society of Biblical Archæology, Sir Henry Rawlinson
in the chair, on December 3, 1872, Mr. George Smith, of the British
Museum, read a paper, giving an account of his discovery, on cuneiform
tablets (part of the so-called library of Ashur-ban-i-pal, king of
Nineveh), of an unquestionable account of the Deluge. The name of the
king under whom this event occurred cannot as yet be deciphered, nor
can anything like a certain date be assigned to it; but Sir Henry
Rawlinson accepted fully the truth of Mr. Smith’s decipherings. Of the
inscription describing the Flood, there are fragments of three copies,
containing duplicate texts.
[6] Layard, First Series. Pls. 10, 12, 13, 15, 25, 27, 28.
[7] Hügel, “Travels in Cashmir,” p. 27, with a picture, p. 247.
[8] Pliny, vii. 57. Cf. also Lucan, Phars. iv. 131. Such vessels were
called “boats sewn together,” Plin. xxiv. 65; and Virgil (Æn. vi. 448)
gives the same title to Charon’s boat.
[9] Layard, “Nineveh and Babylon,” pp. 522-524.
[10] “Relaçion historica del Viage a la America Meridional,” 1748;
Charnock, “Hist. Mar. Arch.” i. p. 12.
[11] Herod. i. 1.
[12] Gen. xlix. 13.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account